These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12453169)

  • 1. Patient reported quality of care before vs. after the implementation of a diagnosis related groups (DRG) classification and payment system in one Swedish county.
    Ljunggren B; Sjödén PO
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2001; 15(4):283-94. PubMed ID: 12453169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-reported quality of life before, compared with after a DRG intervention.
    Ljunggren B; Sjödén PO
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2003 Oct; 15(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 14527987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Have DRG-based prospective payment systems influenced the number of secondary diagnoses in health care administrative data?
    Serdén L; Lindqvist R; Rosén M
    Health Policy; 2003 Aug; 65(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 12849909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospital payment based on diagnosis-related groups differs in Europe and holds lessons for the United States.
    Quentin W; Scheller-Kreinsen D; Blümel M; Geissler A; Busse R
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Apr; 32(4):713-23. PubMed ID: 23569051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Rehabilitation and Diagnosis Related Groups (REDIA Study): impact of DRG introduction in the acute sector on medical rehabilitation in Germany].
    von Eiff W; Meyer N; Klemann A; Greitemann B; Karoff M
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2007 Apr; 46(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 17464902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of the diagnosis-related groups/prospective payment system on nutrition needs in home health and extended-care facilities.
    Sandall MJ; Massey LK
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1989 Oct; 89(10):1444-7. PubMed ID: 2507614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 2008 refinements to the Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System.
    Teenier P
    Home Healthc Nurse; 2008 Mar; 26(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 18332742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do diagnosis-related group-based payments incentivise hospitals to adjust output mix?
    Liang LL
    Health Econ; 2015 Apr; 24(4):454-69. PubMed ID: 24519749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An unintended consequence of provider payment reform: The case of capitation grants in the National Health Insurance reform of Indonesia.
    Tan SY; Qian J
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2019 Oct; 34(4):e1688-e1710. PubMed ID: 31423635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Internal market systems in Sweden: seven years after the Stockholm model.
    Quaye RK
    Eur J Public Health; 2001 Dec; 11(4):380-5. PubMed ID: 11766477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementing DRGs in Slovenia: why the Australian variant was selected.
    Hindle D
    Aust Health Rev; 2003; 26(3):50-60. PubMed ID: 15368820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of elderly hip fracture patients in the Swiss healthcare system: A survey prior to the implementation of DRGs and prior to the implementation ofa Geriatric Fracture Centre.
    Pretto M; Spirig R; Kaelin R; Muri-John V; Kressig RW; Suhm N
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2010; 140():w13086. PubMed ID: 20799101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modifying DRG-PPS to include only diagnoses present on admission: financial implications and challenges.
    Zhan C; Elixhauser A; Friedman B; Houchens R; Chiang YP
    Med Care; 2007 Apr; 45(4):288-91. PubMed ID: 17496711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of the per diem prospective payment system with DRG-like grouping system (DPC/PDPS) on resource usage and healthcare quality in Japan.
    Hamada H; Sekimoto M; Imanaka Y
    Health Policy; 2012 Oct; 107(2-3):194-201. PubMed ID: 22277879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reorientation of market-oriented reforms in Swedish health-care.
    Harrison MI; Calltorp J
    Health Policy; 2000 Jan; 50(3):219-40. PubMed ID: 10827309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnosis-related patient groups].
    Kozierkiewicz A
    Kardiol Pol; 2008 Jun; 66(6):708-10; discussion 711. PubMed ID: 18626844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of care before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. A summary of effects.
    Rogers WH; Draper D; Kahn KL; Keeler EB; Rubenstein LV; Kosecoff J; Brook RH
    JAMA; 1990 Oct; 264(15):1989-94. PubMed ID: 2120478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Monitoring of nursing service context factors: first descriptive results of a cross-sectional Swiss study prior the introduction of SwissDRG].
    Kleinknecht-Dolf M; Spichiger E; Frei IA; Müller M; Martin JS; Spirig R
    Pflege; 2015 Apr; 28(2):93-107. PubMed ID: 25813572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Financial and organisational reforms in the health sector; implications for the financing and management of mental health care services.
    Lien L
    Health Policy; 2003 Jan; 63(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 12468119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system.
    Kahn KL; Rogers WH; Rubenstein LV; Sherwood MJ; Reinisch EJ; Keeler EB; Draper D; Kosecoff J; Brook RH
    JAMA; 1990 Oct; 264(15):1969-73. PubMed ID: 2120476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.