These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12453262)

  • 1. Accuracy of recording horizontal condylar inclination and Bennett angle with the Cadiax compact.
    Celar AG; Tamaki K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Nov; 29(11):1076-81. PubMed ID: 12453262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Cadiax Compact® II accuracy in recording preadjusted condylar inclinations on fully adjustable articulator.
    Ahangari AH; Torabi K; Pour SR; Ghodsi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):504-8. PubMed ID: 23151700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements.
    Bernhardt O; Küppers N; Rosin M; Meyer G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 12616238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical comparative study of Cadiax Compact II and intraoral records using wax and addition silicone.
    Torabi K; Pour SR; Ahangari AH; Ghodsi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):541-3. PubMed ID: 25390868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Articulator-related registration--a simple concept for minimizing eccentric occlusal errors in the articulator.
    Pröschel P; Morneburg T; Hugger A; Kordass B; Ottl P; Niedermeier W; Wichmann M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 12066493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standard and limit values for the symmetry of articulation parameters in the temporomandibular joint area - evaluations of the associated project of the SHIP study.
    Kordaß B; Bernhardt O; Ruge S; Ratzmann A; Hugger S; Hugger A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 31840143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro evaluation of the reliability and validity of an electronic pantograph by testing with five different articulators.
    Chang WS; Romberg E; Driscoll CF; Tabacco MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jul; 92(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 15232566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical comparison of sagittal condylar inclination and Bennett angle derived from a conventional electronic tracking device and an optical jaw tracking device.
    Nigam AA; Lee JD; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38030543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary clinical study of the accuracy of a digital axiographic recording system for the assessment of sagittal condylar inclination.
    Lepidi L; Grande F; Baldassarre G; Suriano C; Li J; Catapano S
    J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104583. PubMed ID: 37331577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Symmetry of horizontal and sagittal condylar path angles: an in vivo study.
    Hernandez AI; Jasinevicius TR; Kaleinikova Z; Sadan A
    Cranio; 2010 Jan; 28(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 20158010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guided versus unguided mandibular movement for duplicating intraoral eccentric tooth contacts in the articulator.
    Celar AG; Tamaki K; Nitsche S; Schneider B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jan; 81(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 9878970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative clinical investigation of horizontal condylar inclination using the JMA electronic recording system and a protrusive wax record for setting articulators.
    Ratzmann A; Mundt T; Schwahn C; Langforth G; Hutzen D; Gedrange T; Kordass B
    Int J Comput Dent; 2007 Jul; 10(3):265-84. PubMed ID: 18271499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A new modular semi-adaptable articulator].
    Lucchini JP; Lavigne J; Brender P; Pastant A; Spirgi M
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Aug; 89(8):756-64. PubMed ID: 293924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study.
    dos Santos J; Nelson S; Nowlin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12589287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the lateral condylar adjustment of nonarcon semiadjustable articulators.
    Taylor TD; Huber LR; Aquilino SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jul; 54(1):140-3. PubMed ID: 3860652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recording sagittal condylar angles using a mandibular facebow.
    Johnson A; Winstanley RB
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 24(12):904-8. PubMed ID: 9467992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A kinematic investigation of mandibular border movement by means of an electronic measuring system. Part II: A study of the Bennett movement.
    Hobo S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 May; 51(5):642-6. PubMed ID: 6587087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Correction of the inclination of the condylar guidance by changing the Bennett angle on the Dentatus articulator].
    Klett R
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1979 Dec; 34(12):873-5. PubMed ID: 398257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influence of registration plate placement on axiographic tracings of mandibular movement in transverse plane mandible].
    Lotzmann U
    ZWR; 1990 Jul; 99(7):538-43. PubMed ID: 2220119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of jaw movements in patients with craniomandibular disorders.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Demling A; Rossbach A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Nov; 33(11):807-12. PubMed ID: 17002739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.