These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12455510)
21. Medical ethics and maternal-fetal conflicts. Drane JF Pa Med; 1992 Jul; 95(7):12-6. PubMed ID: 1408260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Maternal-fetal relationship. The courts and social policy. Blank RH J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):73-92. PubMed ID: 8463752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Winning Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: the crisis of the pro-life movement. Kelly JR America (NY); 1989 Aug; 161(4):79-83. PubMed ID: 11659193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Dotting the I's and crossing the T's: autonomy and/or beneficence? The 'fetus as a patient' in maternal-fetal surgery. Rodrigues HC; van den Berg PP; Düwell M J Med Ethics; 2013 Apr; 39(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 23349508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Rights of and duties to non-consenting patients--informed refusal in the developing world. van Bogaert LJ Dev World Bioeth; 2006 Mar; 6(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 16436170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fetal intervention: Halacha's response to a new bioethical dilemma. Apfel HD J Halacha Contemporary Society; 2003; (46):9-40. PubMed ID: 14696644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses. Warren MA Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Reply to Sarah Burns. Colker R Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Consensual sex without assuming the risk of carrying an unwanted fetus; another foundation for the right to an abortion. Walen A Brooklyn Law Rev; 1997; 63():1051-140. PubMed ID: 12173635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Abortion and the "feminine voice. Wolf-Devine C Public Aff Q; 1989 Jul; 3(3):81-97. PubMed ID: 11652546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Court-ordered obstetrical intervention and the rights of a pregnant woman. Thampapillai D J Law Med; 2005 May; 12(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 15957588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict. Hyams R E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Compelling pregnancy at death's door. Taylor KA Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Preventive ethics strategies for drug abuse during pregnancy. Chervenak FA; McCullough LB J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(2):157-8. PubMed ID: 2131075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Abortion, secular dogma, and the sacrament of sex: another failed attempt to impose moral idiosyncrasies through the ruse of argument. Trotter G Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):51-2. PubMed ID: 21161845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Pregnancy intervention and models of maternal-fetal relationship: philosophical reflections on the Winnipeg C.F.S. dissent. Shanner L Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):751-67. PubMed ID: 12455543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]