These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12455542)

  • 1. Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G.: the impossibility of fetal rights and the obligations of judicial governance.
    DeCoste FC
    Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):725-50. PubMed ID: 12455542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pregnant embodiment and women's autonomy rights in law: an analysis of the language and politics of Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. D.F.G.
    Randall M
    Sask Law Rev; 1999; 62(2):515-42. PubMed ID: 12769105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detention and treatment (competent adult): pregnant woman and unborn child -- Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G. (D.F.
    Grubb A
    Med Law Rev; 1999; 7(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 11658029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Umbilical cords: the new drug connection.
    Phillips M
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1992; 40(2):525-66. PubMed ID: 11651461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pregnancy intervention and models of maternal-fetal relationship: philosophical reflections on the Winnipeg C.F.S. dissent.
    Shanner L
    Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):751-67. PubMed ID: 12455543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissenting with the dissent: Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G. (D.F.).
    Baylis F
    Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):785-98. PubMed ID: 12455546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. D.F.G.: judicial interference with pregnant women in the alleged interest of the fetus.
    Rodgers S
    Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):711-24. PubMed ID: 12455527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The failure of dialogue: Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G. (D.F.).
    Elman BP; Mason J
    Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):768-84. PubMed ID: 12455544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Respecting liberty and preventing harm: limits of state intervention in prenatal choice.
    Mathieu D
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 1985; 8(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 11655781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical treatment (competent adult): pregnant woman and unborn child: Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G.
    Grubb A
    Med Law Rev; 1997; 5(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 11656809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When is a woman's body not her own? According to law, when she's pregnant.
    Scutt JA
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 11651332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal rights and the prosecution of women for using drugs during pregnancy.
    Janssen ND
    Drake Law Rev; 2000; 48(4):741-68. PubMed ID: 12449973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pregnant women and unborn children.
    Williams DW
    Solicit J; 1973 Feb; 117(5):79-81. PubMed ID: 11664217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should mom be constrained in the best interests of the fetus?
    King P
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):393-404. PubMed ID: 11650348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
    Warren MA
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. D.F.G.: a commentary on the law, reproductive autonomy and the allure of technopolicy.
    Caulfield T; Nelson E
    Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):799-809. PubMed ID: 12455548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal-fetal conflict and in utero fetal therapy.
    Steinbock B
    Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):781-93. PubMed ID: 11652864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion and euthanasia: recent developments of the law.
    Horan DJ
    Forum; 1977; 12(4):960-79. PubMed ID: 11663978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A maternal duty to protect fetal health?
    Weinberg SR
    Indiana Law J; 1983; 58(3):531-46. PubMed ID: 16211746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inside the womb: interpreting the Ferguson case.
    Weyrauch S
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():81-90. PubMed ID: 14986666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.