These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12455548)

  • 1. Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. D.F.G.: a commentary on the law, reproductive autonomy and the allure of technopolicy.
    Caulfield T; Nelson E
    Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):799-809. PubMed ID: 12455548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. D.F.G.: judicial interference with pregnant women in the alleged interest of the fetus.
    Rodgers S
    Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):711-24. PubMed ID: 12455527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pregnant embodiment and women's autonomy rights in law: an analysis of the language and politics of Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. D.F.G.
    Randall M
    Sask Law Rev; 1999; 62(2):515-42. PubMed ID: 12769105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pregnancy intervention and models of maternal-fetal relationship: philosophical reflections on the Winnipeg C.F.S. dissent.
    Shanner L
    Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):751-67. PubMed ID: 12455543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissenting with the dissent: Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G. (D.F.).
    Baylis F
    Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):785-98. PubMed ID: 12455546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The failure of dialogue: Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G. (D.F.).
    Elman BP; Mason J
    Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):768-84. PubMed ID: 12455544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G.: the impossibility of fetal rights and the obligations of judicial governance.
    DeCoste FC
    Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):725-50. PubMed ID: 12455542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detention and treatment (competent adult): pregnant woman and unborn child -- Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G. (D.F.
    Grubb A
    Med Law Rev; 1999; 7(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 11658029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mothers and doctors' orders: unmasking the doctor's fiduciary role in maternal-fetal conflicts.
    Oberman M
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2000; 94(2):451-501. PubMed ID: 12455556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delicate balance: the emerging issue of maternal-fetal conflict.
    Allegretti J
    America (NY); 1991 Mar; 164(8):238-9,249-50. PubMed ID: 16144134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical treatment (competent adult): pregnant woman and unborn child: Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G.
    Grubb A
    Med Law Rev; 1997; 5(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 11656809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How far can a state go to protect a fetus? The Rebecca Corneau story and the case for requiring Massachusetts to follow the U.S. Constitution.
    Bower HR
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2001; 31(1):123-54. PubMed ID: 12666688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal needs, physicians' duties.
    Mattingly SS
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 16127865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproductive ability for sale, do I hear $200?: private cash-for-contraception agreements as an alternative to maternal substance abuse.
    Johnson JM
    Ariz Law Rev; 2001; 43(1):205-43. PubMed ID: 12449978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict.
    Hyams R
    E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The right of the fetus to be born free of drug addiction.
    Levine M
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():45-55. PubMed ID: 11661109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rights of and duties to non-consenting patients--informed refusal in the developing world.
    van Bogaert LJ
    Dev World Bioeth; 2006 Mar; 6(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 16436170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fetal rights and the prosecution of women for using drugs during pregnancy.
    Janssen ND
    Drake Law Rev; 2000; 48(4):741-68. PubMed ID: 12449973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
    Warren MA
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crack babies and the Constitution: ruminations about addicted pregnant women after Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Marrus E
    Villanova Law Rev; 2002; 47(2):299-340. PubMed ID: 12680368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.