These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12455555)
1. The second revolution in informed consent: comparing physicians to each other. Twerski AD; Cohen NB Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1999; 94(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 12455555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical necessity determinations: the need for a new legal structure. Hirshfeld EB; Thomason GH Health Matrix Clevel; 1996; 6(1):3-52. PubMed ID: 10167168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The two faces of gag provisions: patients and physicians in a bind. Brand GS; Munoz GM; Nichols MG; Okata MU; Pitt JB; Seager S Yale Law Policy Rev; 1998; 17():249-80. PubMed ID: 16437824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Twerski and Cohen's second revolution: a systems/strategic perspective. LoPucki LM Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1999; 94(1):55-75. PubMed ID: 12784814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The emerging convergence of the doctrine of informed consent and judicial reinterpretation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Blackmon W J Leg Med; 1998 Sep; 19(3):377-95. PubMed ID: 9775579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Liability of managed care organizations expands. Devlin MM J Med Pract Manage; 1999; 15(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 10725048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. ERISA and medical professional liability. Griffen FD; Adelman SH Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jul; 83(7):16-21. PubMed ID: 10345205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Credentialing liability in the managed care arena. Michel CP Tort Insur Law J; 1999; 35(1):137-53. PubMed ID: 11475509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physician liability and managed care: a philosophical perspective. Fine DK Ga State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 19(3):641-703. PubMed ID: 15214340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. QMHC interview with James C. Dechene, JD. Dechene JC Qual Manag Health Care; 2000; 8(3):74-7. PubMed ID: 10947386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Wielding the wand without facing the music: allowing utilization review physicians to trump doctors' orders, but protecting them from legal risk ordinarily attached to the medical degree. Record KL Duke Law J; 2010 Feb; 59(5):955-1000. PubMed ID: 20235400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reconceptualizing informed consent in an era of health care cost containment. Krause JH Iowa Law Rev; 1999 Oct; 85(1):261-386. PubMed ID: 12769114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Is ethics for sale?... Juggling law and ethics in managed care. McKoy JM; Karsjens KL; Wynia M; MacDonald-Glenn L DePaul J Health Care Law; 2005; 8(3):559-613. PubMed ID: 16619425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician gag clauses--the hypocrisy of the Hippocratic Oath. Swanson DS South Ill Univ Law J; 1997; 21():313-34. PubMed ID: 16086489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Crushing your health plan's legal protection. Coleman DL Bus Health; 1997 Aug; 15(8):40-2, 44-6. PubMed ID: 10170211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dries v. Gregor: a case study of informed consent doctrine in New York. Schreiber JA N Y State Bar J; 1981 Oct; 53(6):431-7. PubMed ID: 16044597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physicians in managed care. A multidimensional analysis of new trends in liability and business risk. Richards EP; McLean TR J Leg Med; 1997 Dec; 18(4):443-73. PubMed ID: 9433036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dissing disclosure: just what the doctor ordered. Morris GH Ariz Law Rev; 2002; 44(2):313-71. PubMed ID: 15929239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. To sue or not to sue? Spragins EE Newsweek; 1996 Dec; 128(24):50. PubMed ID: 10162567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]