These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12457678)

  • 21. Correlation between the dioptric power, astigmatism and surface shape of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces.
    Mas D; Espinosa J; Domenech B; Perez J; Kasprzak H; Illueca C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 May; 29(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 19422552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Compensation of corneal oblique astigmatism by internal optics: a theoretical analysis.
    Liu T; Thibos LN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):305-316. PubMed ID: 28281302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. New method of quantifying corneal topographic astigmatism that corresponds with manifest refractive cylinder.
    Alpins N; Ong JK; Stamatelatos G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1978-88. PubMed ID: 23010252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The prediction of surgically induced refractive change from corneal topography.
    Smith RJ; Chan WK; Maloney RK
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jan; 125(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 9437312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Comparison of EyeSys videokeratoscope algorithms in the evaluation of idiopathic and postoperative astigmatism].
    Touzeau O; Borderie V; Chastang P; Scheer S; Allouch C; Laroche L
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1999 Nov; 22(9):936-42. PubMed ID: 10609167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Principles of operation, accuracy and precision of an Eye Surface Profiler.
    Iskander DR; Wachel P; Simpson PN; Consejo A; Jesus DA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 May; 36(3):266-78. PubMed ID: 27112224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of three videokeratoscopes in measurement of toric test surfaces.
    Greivenkamp JE; Mellinger MD; Snyder RW; Schwiegerling JT; Lowman AE; Miller JM
    J Refract Surg; 1996 Feb; 12(2):229-39. PubMed ID: 8653525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Corneal astigmatism measuring module for slit lamps.
    Ventura L; Riul C; Sousa SJ; De Groote JG; Rosa Filho AB; Oliveira GC
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):3085-98. PubMed ID: 16757864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Reproducibility of Scheimpflug Tomography Measurements Regarding Corneal Front and Back Surface Power].
    Stavridis E; Eppig T; Szentmáry N; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Nov; 232(11):1297-303. PubMed ID: 26575536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automated keratoconus detection using the EyeSys videokeratoscope.
    Chastang PJ; Borderie VM; Carvajal-Gonzalez S; Rostène W; Laroche L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 May; 26(5):675-83. PubMed ID: 10831896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [A review of mathematical descriptors of corneal asphericity].
    Gatinel D; Haouat M; Hoang-Xuan T
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2002 Jan; 25(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 11965125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy and precision of EyeSys and Orbscan systems on calibrated spherical test surfaces.
    González Pérez J; Cerviño A; Giraldez MJ; Parafita M; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Eye Contact Lens; 2004 Apr; 30(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 15260351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Videokeratoscope for accurate and detailed measurement of the cornea surface.
    Massig JH; Lingelbach E; Lingelbach B
    Appl Opt; 2005 Apr; 44(12):2281-7. PubMed ID: 15861833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neural networks and statistical analysis for classification of corneal videokeratography maps based on Zernike coefficients: a quantitative comparison.
    Vieira de Carvalho LA; Barbosa MS
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(3):337-41. PubMed ID: 18641817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Regular and irregular refractive powers of the front and back surfaces of the cornea.
    Oshika T; Tomidokoro A; Tsuji H
    Exp Eye Res; 1998 Oct; 67(4):443-7. PubMed ID: 9820792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Underestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photorefractive keratectomy.
    Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Nguyen NX; Kus MM; Küchle M
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Apr; 106(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 10201589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Topography-based intraocular lens power selection.
    Preussner PR; Wahl J; Weitzel D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Mar; 31(3):525-33. PubMed ID: 15811740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The skew ray ambiguity in the analysis of videokeratoscopic data.
    Iskander DR; Davis BA; Collins MJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):435-42. PubMed ID: 17502828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance in specular reflection and slit-imaging corneal topography.
    Braaf B; Dubbelman M; van der Heijde RG; Sicam VA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 May; 86(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 19342978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of the Posterior/Anterior Corneal Curvature Radii Ratio to Improve the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation: Eom's Adjustment Method.
    Kim M; Eom Y; Lee H; Suh YW; Song JS; Kim HM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 59(2):1016-1024. PubMed ID: 29450545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.