These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12457797)

  • 1. Misconduct poll prompts fury among scientists.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 2002 Nov; 360(9346):1669. PubMed ID: 12457797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk scientists and government regulation of ethical behavior: a comparative analysis of opponents and proponents.
    Greenberg M
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):169-76. PubMed ID: 11652292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Introduction to misconduct in science and scientific duties.
    Soskolne CL
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():245-51. PubMed ID: 9857308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent government decision refocuses attention on several cases of alleged scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Sep; 270(11):1286. PubMed ID: 8395607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific misconduct. Ill-defined, redefined.
    Palca J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):4. PubMed ID: 8891701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Institutional and individual responsibilities for integrity in research.
    Steneck NH
    Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(4):51-3. PubMed ID: 12762926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Which ethics for science and public policy?
    Irving DN; Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):77-100. PubMed ID: 11652298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
    Reynolds GH
    Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific misconduct. A final frenzy for landmark cases?
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6355):6-7. PubMed ID: 1731200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Swift justice salvages reputations.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1996 Oct; 274(5286):338. PubMed ID: 8927988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
    Resnik DB
    Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
    Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
    Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
    Steinberg NA
    South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. US Government inquiry bodies dismiss scientific misconduct charges against AIDS researchers.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(22):2665-6. PubMed ID: 8133572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HHS proposes revised regulations on misconduct in research.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Jun; 33(6):12-3. PubMed ID: 15179427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement.
    Koppelman-White E
    Account Res; 2006; 13(3):225-46. PubMed ID: 17124759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Many scientists admit to misconduct: degrees of deception vary in poll; researchers say findings could hurt the field.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 2005 Jun; ():A3. PubMed ID: 15981403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific Misconduct.
    Gross C
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():693-711. PubMed ID: 26273897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.