These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12458398)
1. Lean body mass-based standardized uptake value, derived from a predictive equation, might be misleading in PET studies. Erselcan T; Turgut B; Dogan D; Ozdemir S Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Dec; 29(12):1630-8. PubMed ID: 12458398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lean body mass-based standardized uptake value, derived from a predictive equation, might be misleading in PET studies. Hentschel M; Brink I Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Mar; 30(3):473-4. PubMed ID: 12634975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of anthropometric prediction equations for estimation of lean body mass and appendicular lean soft tissue in Indian men and women. Kulkarni B; Kuper H; Taylor A; Wells JC; Radhakrishna KV; Kinra S; Ben-Shlomo Y; Smith GD; Ebrahim S; Byrne NM; Hills AP J Appl Physiol (1985); 2013 Oct; 115(8):1156-62. PubMed ID: 23950165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of standardized uptake value normalized by individual CT-based lean body mass in application of PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST). Narita A; Shiomi S; Katayama Y; Yamanaga T; Daisaki H; Hamada K; Watanabe Y Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jul; 9(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 26873140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lean body mass correction of standardized uptake value in simultaneous whole-body positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Jochimsen TH; Schulz J; Busse H; Werner P; Schaudinn A; Zeisig V; Kurch L; Seese A; Barthel H; Sattler B; Sabri O Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(12):4651-64. PubMed ID: 26020722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ten predictive equations for estimating lean body mass with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in older patients. Puri T; Blake GM Br J Radiol; 2022 May; 95(1133):20210378. PubMed ID: 35143259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rapid Standardized CT-Based Method to Determine Lean Body Mass SUV for PET-A Significant Improvement Over Prediction Equations. Riauka TA; Baracos VE; Reif R; Juengling FD; Robinson DM; Wieler M; McEwan AJB Front Oncol; 2022; 12():812777. PubMed ID: 35875083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computerized method for automatic evaluation of lean body mass from PET/CT: comparison with predictive equations. Chan T J Nucl Med; 2012 Jan; 53(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 22128325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues. Paquet N; Albert A; Foidart J; Hustinx R J Nucl Med; 2004 May; 45(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 15136627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Existing equations to estimate lean body mass are not accurate in the critically ill: Results of a multicenter observational study. Moisey LL; Mourtzakis M; Kozar RA; Compher C; Heyland DK Clin Nutr; 2017 Dec; 36(6):1701-1706. PubMed ID: 27697303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Method to Improve the Semiquantification of 18F-FDG Uptake: Reliability of the Estimated Lean Body Mass Using the Conventional, Low-Dose CT from PET/CT. Decazes P; Métivier D; Rouquette A; Talbot JN; Kerrou K J Nucl Med; 2016 May; 57(5):753-8. PubMed ID: 26719376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appendicular skeletal muscle in hospitalised hip-fracture patients: development and cross-validation of anthropometric prediction equations against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Villani AM; Crotty M; Cameron ID; Kurrle SE; Skuza PP; Cleland LG; Cobiac L; Miller MD Age Ageing; 2014 Nov; 43(6):857-62. PubMed ID: 25049262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of corrections for blood glucose and body size on [18F]FDG PET standardised uptake values in lung cancer. Hallett WA; Marsden PK; Cronin BF; O'Doherty MJ Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 28(7):919-22. PubMed ID: 11504091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional clinical PET in lung cancer: validation and practical strategies. Calvo R; Martí-Climent JM; Richter JA; Peñuelas I; Crespo-Jara A; Villar LM; García-Velloso MJ J Nucl Med; 2000 Mar; 41(3):439-48. PubMed ID: 10716316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lean mass estimation by creatinine kinetics and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in peritoneal dialysis. Negri AL; Barone R; Veron D; Fraga A; Arrizurieta E; Zucchini A; Zanchetta JR Nephron Clin Pract; 2003; 95(1):c9-14. PubMed ID: 14520016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A method for evaluation of patient-specific lean body mass from limited-coverage CT images and its application in PERCIST: comparison with predictive equation. Shang J; Tan Z; Cheng Y; Tang Y; Guo B; Gong J; Ling X; Wang L; Xu H EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Feb; 8(1):12. PubMed ID: 33555478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and cross-validation of predictive equation for estimating total body lean in children. Colica C; Di Renzo L; Gualtieri P; Romano L; Costa de Miranda R; De Lorenzo A; Purificato I Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2018; 54(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 29616670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel equations to estimate lean body mass in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Noori N; Kovesdy CP; Bross R; Lee M; Oreopoulos A; Benner D; Mehrotra R; Kopple JD; Kalantar-Zadeh K Am J Kidney Dis; 2011 Jan; 57(1):130-9. PubMed ID: 21184920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of CT-based lean-body SUV. Hamill JJ; Sunderland JJ; LeBlanc AK; Kojima CJ; Wall J; Martin EB Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):092504. PubMed ID: 24007180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Body composition in diabetic subjects with chronic kidney disease: interest of bio-impedance analysis, and anthropometry. Rigalleau V; Lasseur C; Chauveau P; Barthes N; Raffaitin C; Combe C; Perlemoine C; Baillet-Blanco L; Gin H Ann Nutr Metab; 2004; 48(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 15665506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]