These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12459617)

  • 1. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years.
    Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van 't Hof MA; Truin GJ
    Caries Res; 2002; 36(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 12459617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between restorations in the permanent dentition produced by hand and rotary instrumentation--survival after 3 years.
    Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van't Hof MA; Truin GJ; van Palenstein Helderman WH
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 12641593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; Taifour D; van 't Hof MA
    J Dent Res; 2006 Jul; 85(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 16798862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years.
    Mandari GJ; Truin GJ; van't Hof MA; Frencken JE
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 11275667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years.
    Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 26(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 9870536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How effective is ART in the management of dental caries?
    Frencken JE; Holmgren CJ
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1999 Dec; 27(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 10600076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ART: a minimal intervention approach to manage dental caries.
    Frencken JE; Holmgren CJ
    Dent Update; 2004 Jun; 31(5):295-8, 301. PubMed ID: 15242264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-year survival of one-surface ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe.
    Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD; Hackenitz E
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9544860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amalgam and ART restorations in children: a controlled clinical trial.
    de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 23455576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
    Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study on the survival of primary molars with intact and with defective restorations.
    Hilgert LA; Frencken JE; de Amorim RG; Mulder J; Leal SC
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 26(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 26567086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is high-viscosity glass-ionomer-cement a successor to amalgam for treating primary molars?
    Hilgert LA; de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE
    Dent Mater; 2014 Oct; 30(10):1172-8. PubMed ID: 25132283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year community field trial in Thailand--survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition.
    Phantumvanit P; Songpaisan Y; Pilot T; Frencken JE
    J Public Health Dent; 1996; 56(3 Spec No):141-5; discussion 161-3. PubMed ID: 8915959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in high-caries Filipino children: results after 2 years.
    Monse-Schneider B; Heinrich-Weltzien R; Schug D; Sheiham A; Borutta A
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 12641594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.