354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12459686)
1. Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional with two "mobile" epidural techniques: anesthetic and analgesic efficacy.
Wilson MJ; Cooper G; MacArthur C; Shennan A;
Anesthesiology; 2002 Dec; 97(6):1567-75. PubMed ID: 12459686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized controlled comparison of epidural analgesia and combined spinal-epidural analgesia in a private practice setting: pain scores during first and second stages of labor and at delivery.
Gambling D; Berkowitz J; Farrell TR; Pue A; Shay D
Anesth Analg; 2013 Mar; 116(3):636-43. PubMed ID: 23400985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Urinary catheterization in labour with high-dose vs mobile epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial.
Wilson MJ; Macarthur C; Shennan A;
Br J Anaesth; 2009 Jan; 102(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 18987057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase the risk of instrumental and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women?
Aneiros F; Vazquez M; Valiño C; Taboada M; Sabaté S; Otero P; Costa J; Carceller J; Vázquez R; Díaz-Vieito M; Rodríguez A; Alvarez J
J Clin Anesth; 2009 Mar; 21(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 19329011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of programmed intermittent epidural boluses and continuous epidural infusion on labor analgesia and obstetric outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.
Ferrer LE; Romero DJ; Vásquez OI; Matute EC; Van de Velde M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Nov; 296(5):915-922. PubMed ID: 28884414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Labor Analgesia Onset With Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Traditional Epidural Using a 26-Gauge Whitacre Needle and 0.125% Bupivacaine Bolus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Wilson SH; Wolf BJ; Bingham K; Scotland QS; Fox JM; Woltz EM; Hebbar L
Anesth Analg; 2018 Feb; 126(2):545-551. PubMed ID: 28622178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labor does not always improve maternal satisfaction.
Nikkola E; Läärä A; Hinkka S; Ekblad U; Kero P; Salonen M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 16532913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal and neonatal effects of adding morphine to low-dose bupivacaine for epidural labor analgesia.
Dostbil A; Celik M; Alici HA; Erdem AF; Aksoy M; Ahiskalioglu A
Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 24553033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized control trial of bupivacaine and fentanyl versus fentanyl-only for epidural analgesia during the second stage of labor.
Craig MG; Grant EN; Tao W; McIntire DD; Leveno KJ
Anesthesiology; 2015 Jan; 122(1):172-7. PubMed ID: 25254902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined spinal-epidural for labor analgesia with low-dose bupi- vacaine but without any opioid in the spinal component: can we improve upon the traditional?
Mitra S; Arora J; Ahuja V; Takkar N
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2015; 66(4):9-15. PubMed ID: 27108464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor: A Biased-Coin Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial to Determine the Optimum Interval Time Between Boluses of a Fixed Volume of 10 mL of Bupivacaine 0.0625% With Fentanyl 2 μg/mL.
Epsztein Kanczuk M; Barrett NM; Arzola C; Downey K; Ye XY; Carvalho JC
Anesth Analg; 2017 Feb; 124(2):537-541. PubMed ID: 27755057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intrathecal levobupivacaine with and without fentanyl in combined spinal epidural for labor analgesia.
Lim Y; Sia AT; Ocampo CE
Med Sci Monit; 2004 Jul; 10(7):PI87-91. PubMed ID: 15232517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The optimal concentration of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for labor pain management using patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Baliuliene V; Macas A; Rimaitis K
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2018 Aug; 35():17-25. PubMed ID: 29914785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial.
Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK
Lancet; 2001 Jul; 358(9275):19-23. PubMed ID: 11454372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine with sufentanil for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized clinical trial.
Wang LZ; Chang XY; Liu X; Hu XX; Tang BL
Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Jan; 123(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 20137366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ropivacaine, 0.1%, plus sufentanil, 0.5 microg/ml, versus bupivacaine, 0.1%, plus sufentanil, 0.5 microg/ml, using patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor: a double-blind comparison.
Fischer C; Blanié P; Jaouën E; Vayssière C; Kaloul I; Coltat JC
Anesthesiology; 2000 Jun; 92(6):1588-93. PubMed ID: 10839907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ambulation in labour and delivery mode: a randomised controlled trial of high-dose vs mobile epidural analgesia.
Wilson MJ; MacArthur C; Cooper GM; Shennan A;
Anaesthesia; 2009 Mar; 64(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 19302638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Epidural Neostigmine versus Fentanyl to Decrease Bupivacaine Use in Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia during Labor: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study.
Booth JL; Ross VH; Nelson KE; Harris L; Eisenach JC; Pan PH
Anesthesiology; 2017 Jul; 127(1):50-57. PubMed ID: 28475555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia.
Wong CA; Ratliff JT; Sullivan JT; Scavone BM; Toledo P; McCarthy RJ
Anesth Analg; 2006 Mar; 102(3):904-9. PubMed ID: 16492849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-controlled epidural technique improves analgesia for labor but increases cesarean delivery rate compared with the intermittent bolus technique.
Halonen P; Sarvela J; Saisto T; Soikkeli A; Halmesmäki E; Korttila K
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 Jul; 48(6):732-7. PubMed ID: 15196106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
