320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12461709)
21. Journalists, district attorneys and researchers: why IRBs should get in the middle.
Chodos AH; Lee SJ
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 16():19. PubMed ID: 25889147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Variation in standards of research compensation and child assent practices: a comparison of 69 institutional review board-approved informed permission and assent forms for 3 multicenter pediatric clinical trials.
Kimberly MB; Hoehn KS; Feudtner C; Nelson RM; Schreiner M
Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):1706-11. PubMed ID: 16651328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The IRB paradox: could the protectors also encourage deceit?
Keith-Spiegel P; Koocher GP
Ethics Behav; 2005; 15(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 16578924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Disclosing conflicts of interest to research subjects: an ethical and legal analysis.
Resnik DB
Account Res; 2004; 11(2):141-59. PubMed ID: 15675055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Medical education research and IRB review: an analysis and comparison of the IRB review process at six institutions.
Dyrbye LN; Thomas MR; Mechaber AJ; Eacker A; Harper W; Massie FS; Power DV; Shanafelt TD
Acad Med; 2007 Jul; 82(7):654-60. PubMed ID: 17595560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research.
Green LA; Lowery JC; Kowalski CP; Wyszewianski L
Health Serv Res; 2006 Feb; 41(1):214-30. PubMed ID: 16430608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ethical and regulatory challenges associated with the exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research: from experimental design to institutional review board approval.
Vaslef SN; Cairns CB; Falletta JM
Arch Surg; 2006 Oct; 141(10):1019-23; discussion 1024. PubMed ID: 17043281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Current issues in clinical research and the development of new pharmaceuticals.
Goldhammer A
Account Res; 2001; 8(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 12481798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Analysis of the Nature of IRB Contingencies Required for Informed Consent Document Approval.
Blackwood RA; Maio RF; Mrdjenovich AJ; VandenBosch TM; Gordon PS; Shipman EL; Hamilton TA
Account Res; 2015; 22(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 25897768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ethical issues in health care institutions. Lesson five: Research ethics.
Bach S; Hartline JV
Radiol Manage; 1991; 13(4):27-33. PubMed ID: 10115834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Conflict + interest: financial incentives and informed consent in human subject research.
Benbow S
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):181-215. PubMed ID: 14986653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.
Enfield KB; Truwit JD
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1330-6. PubMed ID: 18811996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessing social risks prior to commencement of a clinical trial: due diligence or ethical inflation?
Burris S; Davis C
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Nov; 9(11):48-54. PubMed ID: 19882460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics.
Brendel DH; Miller FG
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(4):24-31. PubMed ID: 18576248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Health service research: the square peg in human subjects protection regulations.
Gittner LS; Roach MJ; Kikano G; Grey S; Dawson NV
J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 21071571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions.
Jansson RL
Wash Law Rev; 2003 Feb; 78(1):229-63. PubMed ID: 15732212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Timing invitations to participate in clinical research: preliminary versus informed consent.
Iltis AS
J Med Philos; 2005 Feb; 30(1):89-106. PubMed ID: 15814369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. U.S. Federal Regulations for emergency research: a practical guide and commentary.
McRae A; Weijer C
Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Jan; 15(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 18211320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. IRB reformation: is unfettered access the answer?
Florczak KL; Lockie NM
Nurs Sci Q; 2015 Jan; 28(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 25520457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
