These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12462182)

  • 1. Mammography at a crossroad. How do physicians reconcile conflicting study results with the biologic truths of breast cancer?
    Smith BL
    Postgrad Med; 2002 Nov; 112(5):11-2, 15. PubMed ID: 12462182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
    White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why question screening mammography for women in their forties?
    Fletcher SW
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1259-71. PubMed ID: 7480669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer screening: the underuse of mammography.
    Fox S; Baum JK; Klos DS; Tsou CV
    Radiology; 1985 Sep; 156(3):607-11. PubMed ID: 4023217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false-positive findings.
    Lehman CD; White E; Peacock S; Drucker MJ; Urban N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1651-5. PubMed ID: 10584815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trends in breast cancer screening in Missouri from 1987 to 1995, and predictions for the years 2000 and 2010.
    Sarr M; Simoes EJ; Murayi T; Figgs LT; Brownson RC
    Mo Med; 1998 Dec; 95(12):663-9. PubMed ID: 9863343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu P; Miglioretti DL; Quale C; Rosenberg RD; Cutter G; Geller B; Bacchetti P; Sickles EA; Kerlikowske K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 15741572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physician compliance with mammography guidelines: a retrospective chart review.
    Selinger HA; Goldfarb NI; Perkel RL; Carlson BL
    Fam Med; 1989; 21(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 2721851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of women ages 65 and older on mammography screening and Medicare: results of a national survey.
    Eisner EJ; Zook EG; Goodman N; Macario E
    Women Health; 2002; 36(4):1-18. PubMed ID: 12555798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Stomper PC; Gelman RS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States).
    Eheman CR; Benard VB; Blackman D; Lawson HW; Anderson C; Helsel W; Lee NC
    Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Feb; 17(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16411050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival.
    Blanchard K; Colbert JA; Puri D; Weissman J; Moy B; Kopans DB; Kaine EM; Moore RH; Halpern EF; Hughes KS; Tanabe KK; Smith BL; Michaelson JS
    Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):495-507. PubMed ID: 15274062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use and abuse of mammography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Mahoney L; Csima A
    Can J Surg; 1983 May; 26(3):262-3, 265. PubMed ID: 6850440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.
    Ringash J;
    CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 11233866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of mammography screening in women under age 50 years.
    Eddy DM; Hasselblad V; McGivney W; Hendee W
    JAMA; 1988 Mar; 259(10):1512-9. PubMed ID: 3123720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
    JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Which women aren't getting mammograms and why? (United States).
    Meissner HI; Breen N; Taubman ML; Vernon SW; Graubard BI
    Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Feb; 18(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 17186422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.