333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12462286)
1. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and cromolyn sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
Katelaris CH; Ciprandi G; Missotten L; Turner FD; Bertin D; Berdeaux G;
Clin Ther; 2002 Oct; 24(10):1561-75. PubMed ID: 12462286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus placebo for controlling the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhinoconjunctivitis.
Abelson MB; Turner D
Clin Ther; 2003 Mar; 25(3):931-47. PubMed ID: 12852709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Loteprednol etabonate suspension 0.2% administered QID compared with olopatadine solution 0.1% administered BID in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients.
Gong L; Sun X; Qu J; Wang L; Zhang M; Zhang H; Wang L; Gu Y; Elion-Mboussa A; Roy L; Zhu B
Clin Ther; 2012 Jun; 34(6):1259-1272.e1. PubMed ID: 22627057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.
Spangler DL; Abelson MB; Ober A; Gotnes PJ
Clin Ther; 2003 Aug; 25(8):2245-67. PubMed ID: 14512132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and loteprednol etabonate 0.2% ophthalmic suspension in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Berdy GJ; Stoppel JO; Epstein AB
Clin Ther; 2002 Jun; 24(6):918-29. PubMed ID: 12117082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Double-masked, randomized, parallel-group study comparing olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution with cromolyn sodium 2% and levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic preparations in children with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
Ciprandi G; Turner D; Gross RD
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp; 2004 Mar; 65(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 24764588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.2% compared with placebo in patients with allergic conjunctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis: a randomized, double-masked environmental study.
Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Vogelson CT; Pasquine TA; Gross RD; Turner FD; Wells DT; Bergamini MV; Robertson SM
Clin Ther; 2004 Aug; 26(8):1237-48. PubMed ID: 15476905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the clinical efficacy of pheniramine maleate/naphazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Greiner JV; Udell IJ
Clin Ther; 2005 May; 27(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 15978305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy GJ
Clin Ther; 2001 Aug; 23(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 11558863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined analysis of two studies using the conjunctival allergen challenge model to evaluate olopatadine hydrochloride, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity.
Abelson MB; Spitalny L
Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 9645717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of olopatadine ophthalmic solution 0.2% in reducing signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Pasquine T; Edwards MR; Gross RD; Robertson SM
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2007; 28(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 17883910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine vs epinastine ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Lanier BQ; Finegold I; D'Arienzo P; Granet D; Epstein AB; Ledgerwood GL
Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1227-33. PubMed ID: 15324525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the effects of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% and olopatadine HCl 0.1% ophthalmic solutions in seasonal allergic conjunctivities: a 30-day, randomized, double-masked, artificial tear substitute-controlled trial.
Avunduk AM; Tekelioglu Y; Turk A; Akyol N
Clin Ther; 2005 Sep; 27(9):1392-402. PubMed ID: 16291412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
Lanier BQ; Abelson MB; Berger WE; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Spangler DL; Kägi MK
Clin Ther; 2002 Jul; 24(7):1161-74. PubMed ID: 12182260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A multicenter, double-masked, randomized evaluation of olopatadine 0.2% using the conjunctival allergen challenge model in Japanese patients with allergic conjunctivitis].
Ohno S;
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Dec; 116(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 23379201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) versus ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) using the provocative antigen challenge model.
Deschenes J; Discepola M; Abelson M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):47-52. PubMed ID: 10337433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of comfort using olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers compared to placebo using the conjunctival allergen-challenge model.
Brodsky M; Berger WE; Butrus S; Epstein AB; Irkec M
Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Apr; 29(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12695716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of preservative-free ketotifen fumarate and preserved olopatadine hydrochloride eye drops in the treatment of moderate to severe seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
Mortemousque B; Bourcier T; Khairallah M; Messaoud R; Brignole-Baudouin F; Renault D; Rebika H; Brémond-Gignac D;
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24388379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of olopatadine 0.2% ophthalmic solution versus fluticasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.
Rosenwasser LJ; Mahr T; Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Kennedy K
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2008; 29(6):644-53. PubMed ID: 19063816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and comfort of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in the human conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Butrus S; Greiner JV; Discepola M; Finegold I
Clin Ther; 2000 Dec; 22(12):1462-72. PubMed ID: 11192137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
