143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12462542)
1. The use of an infrared eyetracker to measure fixation stability.
Crossland MD; Rubin GS
Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Nov; 79(11):735-9. PubMed ID: 12462542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fixation stability: a comparison between the Nidek MP-1 and the Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope in persons with and without diabetic maculopathy.
Dunbar HM; Crossland MD; Rubin GS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Aug; 51(8):4346-50. PubMed ID: 20335616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scanning eye movements in homonymous hemianopia documented by scanning laser ophthalmoscope retinal perimetry.
Jamara RJ; Van De Velde F; Peli E
Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):495-504. PubMed ID: 12858085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microperimetry--comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope--fundus perimetry.
Rohrschneider K; Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 15672526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gaze changes with binocular versus monocular viewing in age-related macular degeneration.
Kabanarou SA; Crossland MD; Bellmann C; Rees A; Culham LE; Rubin GS
Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2251-8. PubMed ID: 16996593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retinal location of the preferred retinal locus relative to the fovea in scanning laser ophthalmoscope images.
Timberlake GT; Sharma MK; Grose SA; Gobert DV; Gauch JM; Maino JH
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Mar; 82(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 15767869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fixation pattern in healthy subjects during microperimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Källmark FP; Ygge J
Med Sci Monit; 2008 Jun; 14(6):CR311-315. PubMed ID: 18509274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability in monocular and binocular fixation during standard automated perimetry.
Hirasawa K; Kobayashi K; Shibamoto A; Tobari H; Fukuda Y; Shoji N
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207517. PubMed ID: 30462706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fixation Stability and Viewing Distance in Patients with AMD.
Tarita-Nistor L; González EG; Brin T; Mandelcorn MS; Scherlen AC; Mandelcorn ED; Steinbach MJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):239-245. PubMed ID: 27811525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope fundus cyclometry in near-natural viewing conditions.
Ehrt O; Boergen KP
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Sep; 239(9):678-82. PubMed ID: 11688667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying eye stability during a fixation task: a review of definitions and methods.
Castet E; Crossland M
Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(5):449-69. PubMed ID: 22370759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-sensitivity testing with scanning-laser ophthalmoscope stimulation in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients.
Horn F; Budde W; Korth M
Ger J Ophthalmol; 1996 Nov; 5(6):428-34. PubMed ID: 9479531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fixation stability using central and pericentral fixation targets in patients with age-related macular degeneration.
Bellmann C; Feely M; Crossland MD; Kabanarou SA; Rubin GS
Ophthalmology; 2004 Dec; 111(12):2265-70. PubMed ID: 15582084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry and anatomic abnormalities in patients with subfoveal neovascularization.
Tezel TH; Del Priore LV; Flowers BE; Grosof DH; Benenson IL; Zamora RL; Kaplan HJ
Ophthalmology; 1996 Nov; 103(11):1829-36. PubMed ID: 8942878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of source intensity on ability to fixate: implications for laser safety.
Lund BJ; Zwick H; Lund DJ; Stuck BE
Health Phys; 2003 Nov; 85(5):567-77. PubMed ID: 14571989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in Fixation Stability with Time during Binocular and Monocular Viewing in Maculopathy.
Samet S; González EG; Mandelcorn MS; Brent MH; Tarita-Nistor L
Vision (Basel); 2018 Oct; 2(4):. PubMed ID: 31735903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [New examination methods for macular disorders--application of diagnosis and treatment].
Yoshida A
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Dec; 104(12):899-942. PubMed ID: 11193944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distortion and size calibration of the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) laser-beam raster.
Timberlake GT; Sharma MK; Gobert DV; Maino JH
Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 80(11):772-7. PubMed ID: 14627945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential acuity meter versus scanning laser ophthalmoscope to predict visual acuity in cataract patients.
Cuzzani OE; Ellant JP; Young PW; Gimbel HV; Rydz M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 1998 Feb; 24(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 9530603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient selection for macular translocation surgery using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Fujii GY; de Juan E; Sunness J; Humayun MS; Pieramici DJ; Chang TS
Ophthalmology; 2002 Sep; 109(9):1737-44. PubMed ID: 12208725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
