These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12462684)

  • 1. A comparison of splinted and banded Herbst appliances: treatment changes and complications.
    Hägg U; Tse EL; Rabie AB; Robinson W
    Aust Orthod J; 2002 Nov; 18(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 12462684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The integrated Herbst appliance--treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group.
    Hägglund P; Segerdal S; Forsberg CM
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 18216374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
    Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft tissue changes produced by a banded-type Herbst appliance in late mixed dentition patients.
    de Almeida MR; Flores-Mir C; Brandão AG; de Almeida RR; de Almeida-Pedrin RR
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18575306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency of three mandibular anchorage forms in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation.
    Weschler D; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15747811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition.
    de Almeida MR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Weber U; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):540-7. PubMed ID: 16097222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A long-term follow-up study of Class II malocclusion correction after treatment with Class II elastics or fixed functional appliances.
    Nelson B; Hägg U; Hansen K; Bendeus M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 17920503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
    Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
    Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Treatment of Class II malocclusion using the Herbst appliance].
    Schiavoni R
    Mondo Ortod; 1990; 15(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2402252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Barnett GA; Higgins DW; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Mar; 78(2):361-9. PubMed ID: 18251608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Post-treatment occlusal changes in Class II division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Bock N; Ruf S
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):606-13. PubMed ID: 19054814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Windmiller EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the headgear activator and Herbst appliance--effects and post-treatment changes.
    Phan KL; Bendeus M; Hägg U; Hansen K; Rabie AB
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):594-604. PubMed ID: 17142260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical complications during treatment with a modified Herbst appliance in combination with a lingual appliance.
    Wiechmann D; Vu J; Schwestka-Polly R; Helms HJ; Knösel M
    Head Face Med; 2015 Sep; 11():31. PubMed ID: 26353793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of Class II high angle malocclusions with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation.
    Schiavoni R; Grenga V; Macri V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Nov; 102(5):393-409. PubMed ID: 1476105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric evaluation of the therapeutic effects of the Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II. Div I. malocclusion.
    Küçükkeleş N; Sandalli T
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1992 Sep; 1(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 1308783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes.
    Sharma AA; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 15821692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The study on treatment of Chinese children's Class II malocclusion by Herbst appliance].
    Xu B; Urban H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1998 Mar; 33(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 11774687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.