540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12462739)
1. Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2705-17. PubMed ID: 12462739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of IMRT optimization based on a pencil beam and a superposition algorithm.
Scholz C; Nill S; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1909-13. PubMed ID: 12906209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric advantage of using 6 MV over 15 MV photons in conformal therapy of lung cancer: Monte Carlo studies in patient geometries.
Wang L; Yorke E; Desobry G; Chui CS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11818004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pareto front analysis of 6 and 15 MV dynamic IMRT for lung cancer using pencil beam, AAA and Monte Carlo.
Ottosson RO; Karlsson A; Behrens CF
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4521-33. PubMed ID: 20668346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of inhomogeneity correction algorithms in small photon fields.
Jones AO; Das IJ
Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 32(3):766-76. PubMed ID: 15839349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective monte carlo dose calculations with limited beam weight information.
Lindsay PE; El Naqa I; Hope AJ; Vicic M; Cui J; Bradley JD; Deasy JO
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):334-46. PubMed ID: 17278519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A clinical study of lung cancer dose calculation accuracy with Monte Carlo simulation.
Zhao Y; Qi G; Yin G; Wang X; Wang P; Li J; Xiao M; Li J; Kang S; Liao X
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Dec; 9():287. PubMed ID: 25511623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of X-ray voxel Monte Carlo versus pencil beam-based dose calculation in stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer under normal and deep inspiration breath hold.
Landoni V; Borzì GR; Strolin S; Bruzzaniti V; Soriani A; D'Alessio D; Ambesi F; Di Grazia AM; Strigari L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jun; 14(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 25223324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo dose computation for IMRT optimization.
Laub W; Alber M; Birkner M; Nüsslin F
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Jul; 45(7):1741-54. PubMed ID: 10943916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation for breast cancer.
Li JS; Freedman GM; Price R; Wang L; Anderson P; Chen L; Xiong W; Yang J; Pollack A; Ma CM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1023-31. PubMed ID: 15191288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system.
Boudreau C; Heath E; Seuntjens J; Ballivy O; Parker W
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 15798262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of beam number on organ-at-risk sparing in dynamic multileaf collimator delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Popple RA; Fiveash JB; Brezovich IA
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3752-9. PubMed ID: 17985620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Zheng D; Zhang Q; Liang X; Zhu X; Verma V; Wang S; Zhou S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):48-58. PubMed ID: 27455476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
