These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12464329)

  • 1. Spatiotemporal analysis of the neuromagnetic response to rhythmic auditory stimulation: rate dependence and transient to steady-state transition.
    Carver FW; Fuchs A; Jantzen KJ; Kelso JA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Dec; 113(12):1921-31. PubMed ID: 12464329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency.
    Roberts TP; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 1996 Apr; 7(6):1138-40. PubMed ID: 8817518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory cortex responses to the transition from monophonic to pseudo-stereo sound.
    Ross B; Herdman AT; Wollbrink A; Pantev C
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():18. PubMed ID: 16012692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency characteristics of neuromagnetic auditory steady-state responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sweep tones.
    Otsuka A; Yumoto M; Kuriki S; Hotehama T; Nakagawa S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):790-802. PubMed ID: 26162292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel type of auditory responses: temporal dynamics of 40-Hz steady-state responses induced by changes in sound localization.
    Ross B
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1265-77. PubMed ID: 18632891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortical steady-state responses to central and peripheral auditory beats.
    Draganova R; Ross B; Wollbrink A; Pantev C
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 May; 18(5):1193-200. PubMed ID: 17827173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of stimulus frequency and stimulation site on the N1m response of the human auditory cortex.
    Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Ragot R; Schwartz D; Ducorps A; Norena A; Durrant JD; Bonmartin A; Cotton F; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2004 Nov; 197(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 15504604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses.
    Ross B; Herdman AT; Pantev C
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Dec; 15(12):2029-39. PubMed ID: 15772375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency specificity of 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses.
    Ross B; Draganova R; Picton TW; Pantev C
    Hear Res; 2003 Dec; 186(1-2):57-68. PubMed ID: 14644459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Latency of evoked neuromagnetic M100 reflects perceptual and acoustic stimulus attributes.
    Roberts TP; Ferrari P; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 1998 Oct; 9(14):3265-9. PubMed ID: 9831462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal resolution properties of human auditory cortex: reflections in the neuromagnetic auditory evoked M100 component.
    Gage N; Roberts TP; Hickok G
    Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 1069(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 16403467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptation of neuromagnetic N1 without shifts in dipolar orientation.
    Campbell T; Neuvonen T
    Neuroreport; 2007 Mar; 18(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 17435606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neuromagnetic auditory steady-state responses to amplitude modulated sounds following dichotic or monaural presentation.
    Lazzouni L; Ross B; Voss P; Lepore F
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 20005163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term effects of single repetitive TMS sessions on auditory evoked activity in patients with chronic tinnitus.
    Lorenz I; Müller N; Schlee W; Langguth B; Weisz N
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 104(3):1497-505. PubMed ID: 20592125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One set of sounds, two tonotopic maps: exploring auditory cortex with amplitude-modulated tones.
    Weisz N; Keil A; Wienbruch C; Hoffmeister S; Elbert T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1249-58. PubMed ID: 15134691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binaural interaction in the human auditory cortex revealed by neuromagnetic frequency tagging: no effect of stimulus intensity.
    Kaneko K; Fujiki N; Hari R
    Hear Res; 2003 Sep; 183(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 13679132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Translating Adult Electrophysiology Findings to Younger Patient Populations: Difficulty Measuring 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses in Typically Developing Children and Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
    Edgar JC; Fisk CL; Liu S; Pandey J; Herrington JD; Schultz RT; Roberts TP
    Dev Neurosci; 2016; 38(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 26730806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.
    Krumbholz K; Patterson RD; Seither-Preisler A; Lammertmann C; Lütkenhöner B
    Cereb Cortex; 2003 Jul; 13(7):765-72. PubMed ID: 12816892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The dependence of the auditory evoked N1m decrement on the bandwidth of preceding notch-filtered noise.
    Okamoto H; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Kubo T; Pantev C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Apr; 21(7):1957-61. PubMed ID: 15869488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.