These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12464382)

  • 1. An experiment of mailing physician surveys on two different issues in joint or separate mail.
    Sauerland S; Neugebauer EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2002 Oct; 55(10):1046-8. PubMed ID: 12464382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Del Valle ML; Morgenstern H; Rogstad TL; Albright C; Vickrey BG
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Dec; 20(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 10183331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects on response rates and costs of stamps vs business reply in a mail survey of physicians.
    Urban N; Anderson GL; Tseng A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 May; 46(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 8501471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
    McMahon SR; Iwamoto M; Massoudi MS; Yusuf HR; Stevenson JM; David F; Chu SY; Pickering LK
    Pediatrics; 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. PubMed ID: 12671142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increasing response rates for mailed surveys of Medicaid clients and other low-income populations.
    Gibson PJ; Koepsell TD; Diehr P; Hale C
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Jun; 149(11):1057-62. PubMed ID: 10355382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing response rates in physicians' mail surveys: an experimental study.
    Maheux B; Legault C; Lambert J
    Am J Public Health; 1989 May; 79(5):638-9. PubMed ID: 2705601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. E-mail versus conventional postal mail survey of geriatric chiefs.
    Raziano DB; Jayadevappa R; Valenzula D; Weiner M; Lavizzo-Mourey R
    Gerontologist; 2001 Dec; 41(6):799-804. PubMed ID: 11723348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of various mailing strategies among nonrespondents in a prospective cohort study.
    Rimm EB; Stampfer MJ; Colditz GA; Giovannucci E; Willett WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jun; 131(6):1068-71. PubMed ID: 2343859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating patients' experiences with individual physicians: a randomized trial of mail, internet, and interactive voice response telephone administration of surveys.
    Rodriguez HP; von Glahn T; Rogers WH; Chang H; Fanjiang G; Safran DG
    Med Care; 2006 Feb; 44(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16434916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.
    Asch DA; Jedrziewski MK; Christakis NA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Oct; 50(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 9368521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No difference demonstrated between faxed or mailed prenotification in promoting questionnaire response among family physicians: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gattellari M; Zwar N; Worthington JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 22445084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey.
    Baron G; De Wals P; Milord F
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Mar; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of responses to a US 2 dollar bill versus a chance to win 250 US dollars in a mail survey of emergency physicians.
    Tamayo-Sarver JH; Baker DW
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Aug; 11(8):888-91. PubMed ID: 15289200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of two mailing strategies on the response to a survey of physicians.
    Shiono PH; Klebanoff MA
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Sep; 134(5):539-42. PubMed ID: 1897510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing response rates in telephone surveys: a randomized trial.
    Smith W; Chey T; Jalaludin B; Salkeld G; Capon T
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Mar; 17(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 7786565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do postage stamps versus pre-paid envelopes increase responses to patient mail surveys? A randomised controlled trial.
    Lavelle K; Todd C; Campbell M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 May; 8():113. PubMed ID: 18507819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial.
    Ernst SA; Brand T; Lhachimi SK; Zeeb H
    Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 53(2):879-895. PubMed ID: 28217941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method for achieving high response rates in national surveys of U.S. primary care physicians.
    Brtnikova M; Crane LA; Allison MA; Hurley LP; Beaty BL; Kempe A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202755. PubMed ID: 30138406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians.
    Everett SA; Price JH; Bedell AW; Telljohann SK
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Jun; 20(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 10183321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survey return rates as a function of priority versus first-class mailing.
    Brems C; Johnson ME; Warner T; Roberts LW
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 17153820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.