80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12465598)
1. [MR aortofemorography versus DSA: prospective evaluation].
Nchimi A; Brisbois D; Donkers E; Biquet JF; Saive C; Jadot A; Magotteaux R
JBR-BTR; 2002; 85(5):246-51. PubMed ID: 12465598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [First clinical results in a study of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with the 1.0 molar gadobutrol in peripheral arterial occlusive disease--comparison to intraarterial DSA].
Schäfer FK; Schäfer PJ; Jahnke T; Walluscheck K; Priebe M; Hentsch A; Heller M; Brossmann J
Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 12677513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae by multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary experience.
Planken RN; Tordoir JH; Dammers R; de Haan MW; Oei TK; van der Sande FM; van Engelshoven JM; Leiner T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jan; 17(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12500274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Angiography compared to high resolution magnetic resonance and digital angiography in atherosclerosis of the iliac-femoral arteries].
Carriero A; Gatta S; Baratto M; Marano R; Aulisa R; Bonomo L
Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 9638159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities: standard-dose vs. high-dose gadodiamide injection.
Krause U; Kroencke T; Spielhaupter E; Taupitz M; Kenn W; Hamm B; Hahn D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15778953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of single-dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in therapy indications in abdominal and iliac arteries.
Schaefer PJ; Schaefer FK; Mueller-Huelsbeck S; Both M; Heller M; Jahnke T
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 17278036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Review of source images is necessary for the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for renal artery stenosis.
Wehrschuetz M; Aschauer M; Portugaller H; Stix A; Wehrschuetz-Sigl E; Hausegger K; Ebner F
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004; 27(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 15383846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Fully automated floating table MR angiography of pelvic and leg arteries: initial clinical results].
Janka R; Fellner FA; Fellner C; Requardt M; Lang W; Wutke R; Eder S; Bautz W
Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(2):62-70. PubMed ID: 11681083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Varga-Szemes A; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ; Suranyi P; De Cecco CN; Muscogiuri G; Caruso D; Yamada RT; Litwin SE; Tesche C; Duguay TM; Giri S; Vliegenthart R; Todoran TM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 10(10 Pt A):1116-1124. PubMed ID: 28109932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the uterine artery before uterine arterial embolization: comparison of unenhanced 3D water-excitation sensitivity-encoding time-of-flight (WEST) and gadolinium-enhanced 3D sensitivity-encoding water-excitation multishot echo-planar (SWEEP) MR angiography.
Mori K; Shiigai M; Ueda T; Kita N; Tanaka N; Minami M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Mar; 27(3):557-62. PubMed ID: 18307198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Critical lower-limb ischemia: the diagnostic performance of dual-phase injection MR angiography (including high-resolution distal imaging) compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Owen AR; Robertson IR; Annamalai G; Roditi GH; Edwards RD; Murray LS; Moss JG
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Feb; 20(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 19081736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Preoperative imaging in 78 living kidney donors using CE-MRA and DSA].
Lemke U; Taupitz M; Klüner C; Giessing M; Schönberger B; Hamm B; Kröncke TJ
Rofo; 2008 Jan; 180(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 18092278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with parallel imaging techniques before endovascular interventional treatment of arterial stenosis.
Lin J; Li D; Yan F
Vasc Med; 2009 Nov; 14(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 19808715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR angiography of the lower extremities with a moving-bed infusion-tracking technique.
Klein WM; Schlejen PM; Eikelboom BC; van der Graaf Y; Mali WP
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2003; 26(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12522641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of treatment plans for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease made with electrocardiography-triggered two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Hoch JR; Kennell TW; Hollister MS; Sproat IA; Swan JS; Acher CW; Burks J; Heisey DM
Am J Surg; 1999 Aug; 178(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 10487272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.
Meissner OA; Verrel F; Tató F; Siebert U; Ramirez H; Ruppert V; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 7 T versus 1.5 T time-of-flight MR angiography - initial experience.
Mönninghoff C; Maderwald S; Theysohn JM; Kraff O; Ladd SC; Ladd ME; Forsting M; Quick HH; Wanke I
Rofo; 2009 Jan; 181(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 19115164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences.
U-King-Im JM; Trivedi R; Cross J; Higgins N; Graves M; Kirkpatrick P; Antoun N; Gillard JH
Clin Radiol; 2004 Apr; 59(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 15041456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
