These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12465647)
1. From Baby M. to Jaycee B.: fathers, mothers, and children in the brave new world. Hale JV J Contemp Law; 1998; 24(2):335-75. PubMed ID: 12465647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of prebirth parentage orders in surrogacy proceedings. Snyder SH; Byrn MP Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):633-62. PubMed ID: 16610150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Surrogacy: the case for full contractual enforcement. Epstein RA Va Law Rev; 1995 Nov; 81(8):2305-41. PubMed ID: 16086503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Amicus brief: In the matter of Baby M. Taub N Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):7-24. PubMed ID: 16086457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproductive surrogacy at the millennium: proposed model legislation regulating "non-traditional" gestational surrogacy contracts. Havins WE; Dalessio JJ McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 31(3):673-701. PubMed ID: 15709263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Marriage of Buzzanca: charting a new destiny. O'Hara MD; Vorzimer AW West State Univ Law Rev; 1998-1999; 26():25-45. PubMed ID: 12625315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Who's your daddy (and mommy)? Creating certainty for Texas couples entering into surrogacy contracts. Holliday AM Tex Tech Law Rev; 2003; 34(4):1101-32. PubMed ID: 15568281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assisted reproductive technologies: contracts, consents, and controversies. Elster NR Am J Fam Law; 2005; 18(4):193-9. PubMed ID: 17153245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Baby M: catalyst for family law reform? Wadlington WJ J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():1-20. PubMed ID: 11645619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Surrogacy: a last resort alternative for infertile women or a commodification of women's bodies and children? Kerian CL Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 12(1):113-66. PubMed ID: 16281339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. (Baby) M is for the many things: why I start with Baby M. Sanger C St Louis Univ Law J; 2000; 44(4):1443-64. PubMed ID: 12449927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Who are the parents of biotechnological children? Palmer LI Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Contracts to bear a child: the mixed legislative signals. Wadlington WJ Ida Law Rev; 1992-1993; 29(2):383-410. PubMed ID: 11652308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference. Birck ML Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Where do the children go?--surrogate mother contracts and the best interests of the child. Carney BJ Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1988; 22(4):1187-217. PubMed ID: 15929235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stopping the baby-trade: affirming the value of human life through the invalidation of surrogacy contracts: a blueprint for New Mexico. Combs JR N M Law Rev; 1999; 29(2):407-28. PubMed ID: 12778924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re marriage of Buzzanca: trial court analysis. Monarch RD West State Univ Law Rev; 1998-1999; 26():1-24. PubMed ID: 12953669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biology, technology and geneology: a proposed uniform surrogacy legislation. Levitt J Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1992; 25(3):451-519. PubMed ID: 11651577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal, moral & international perspectives on surrogate motherhood: the call for a uniform regulatory scheme. Behm LL DePaul J Health Care Law; 1999; 2(3):557-603. PubMed ID: 12159903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The power of pregnancy: examining constitutional rights in a gestational surrogacy contract. Ohs A Hastings Constit Law Q; 2002; 29(2):339-72. PubMed ID: 15174440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]