224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12465647)
1. From Baby M. to Jaycee B.: fathers, mothers, and children in the brave new world.
Hale JV
J Contemp Law; 1998; 24(2):335-75. PubMed ID: 12465647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of prebirth parentage orders in surrogacy proceedings.
Snyder SH; Byrn MP
Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):633-62. PubMed ID: 16610150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Surrogacy: the case for full contractual enforcement.
Epstein RA
Va Law Rev; 1995 Nov; 81(8):2305-41. PubMed ID: 16086503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Amicus brief: In the matter of Baby M.
Taub N
Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):7-24. PubMed ID: 16086457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproductive surrogacy at the millennium: proposed model legislation regulating "non-traditional" gestational surrogacy contracts.
Havins WE; Dalessio JJ
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 31(3):673-701. PubMed ID: 15709263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Marriage of Buzzanca: charting a new destiny.
O'Hara MD; Vorzimer AW
West State Univ Law Rev; 1998-1999; 26():25-45. PubMed ID: 12625315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Who's your daddy (and mommy)? Creating certainty for Texas couples entering into surrogacy contracts.
Holliday AM
Tex Tech Law Rev; 2003; 34(4):1101-32. PubMed ID: 15568281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assisted reproductive technologies: contracts, consents, and controversies.
Elster NR
Am J Fam Law; 2005; 18(4):193-9. PubMed ID: 17153245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Baby M: catalyst for family law reform?
Wadlington WJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():1-20. PubMed ID: 11645619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Surrogacy: a last resort alternative for infertile women or a commodification of women's bodies and children?
Kerian CL
Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 12(1):113-66. PubMed ID: 16281339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. (Baby) M is for the many things: why I start with Baby M.
Sanger C
St Louis Univ Law J; 2000; 44(4):1443-64. PubMed ID: 12449927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Who are the parents of biotechnological children?
Palmer LI
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Contracts to bear a child: the mixed legislative signals.
Wadlington WJ
Ida Law Rev; 1992-1993; 29(2):383-410. PubMed ID: 11652308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference.
Birck ML
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Where do the children go?--surrogate mother contracts and the best interests of the child.
Carney BJ
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1988; 22(4):1187-217. PubMed ID: 15929235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stopping the baby-trade: affirming the value of human life through the invalidation of surrogacy contracts: a blueprint for New Mexico.
Combs JR
N M Law Rev; 1999; 29(2):407-28. PubMed ID: 12778924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re marriage of Buzzanca: trial court analysis.
Monarch RD
West State Univ Law Rev; 1998-1999; 26():1-24. PubMed ID: 12953669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biology, technology and geneology: a proposed uniform surrogacy legislation.
Levitt J
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1992; 25(3):451-519. PubMed ID: 11651577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal, moral & international perspectives on surrogate motherhood: the call for a uniform regulatory scheme.
Behm LL
DePaul J Health Care Law; 1999; 2(3):557-603. PubMed ID: 12159903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The power of pregnancy: examining constitutional rights in a gestational surrogacy contract.
Ohs A
Hastings Constit Law Q; 2002; 29(2):339-72. PubMed ID: 15174440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
