These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12465647)

  • 21. Whose baby is it? Surrogate motherhood after Baby M.
    Rust M
    ABA J; 1987 Jun; 73(6):52, 54-56. PubMed ID: 11649853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Matters of life and death: inheritance consequences of reproductive technologies.
    Shapo HS
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1997; 25(4):1091-220. PubMed ID: 11858286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Baby-sitting consideration: surrogate mother's right to "rent her womb" for a fee.
    Sly KM
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1982-1983; 18(3):539-65. PubMed ID: 11658877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Regulating advanced reproductive technologies: a comparative analysis of Jewish and American law.
    Povarsky C
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1998; 29(3):409-83. PubMed ID: 12755152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The aftermath of Baby M: proposed state laws on surrogate motherhood.
    Andrews LB
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):31-40. PubMed ID: 3692805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Arguing the "obvious" in Wisconsin: why state regulation of assisted reproductive technology has not come to pass, and how it should.
    Katers LM
    Wis L Rev; 2000; (2):441-70. PubMed ID: 12465640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surrogacy.
    New Hampshire
    N H Revis Statut Annot N H; 1995 Nov; Sects. 168.13.1 to 168.13.31():168-13:1 to 168-13:31. PubMed ID: 12043610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Disputing over embryos: of contracts and consents.
    Waldman EA
    Ariz State Law J; 2000; 32(3):897-940. PubMed ID: 12769122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contracts to bear a child.
    Erickson EA
    Calif Law Rev; 1978 May; 66(3):611-22. PubMed ID: 11662003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surrogate motherhood and the limits of rational ethics.
    Newton LH
    Logos (Santa Clara); 1988; 9():113-34. PubMed ID: 12708423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reproductive technology comes of age.
    Andrews LB
    Whittier Law Rev; 1999; 21(2):375-89. PubMed ID: 12199233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The proposed model surrogate parenthood act: a legislative response to the challenges of reproductive technology.
    Manus ML
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1996; 29(3):671-773. PubMed ID: 12071207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Beyond Baby M: international perspectives on gestational surrogacy and the demise of the unitary biological mother.
    Krim TM
    Ann Health Law; 1996; (5):193-226. PubMed ID: 10184657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The law and surrogate parenting: is an agreement to bear a child for another enforceable?--With illustrative documents used to create the surrogacy arrangement which led to the "Baby M" case.
    Kindregan CP
    Report Hum Reprod Law; 1987; No. 9():106-34. PubMed ID: 11650092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Redefining parenthood.
    Halperin-Kaddari R
    Calif West Int Law J; 1999; 29(2):313-37. PubMed ID: 12611404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Parental rights and the definition of motherhood in surrogate motherhood.
    Rae SB
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1994; 3(2):219-77. PubMed ID: 11660411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The limits of contract in family law: an analysis of surrogate motherhood.
    Carbone J
    Logos (Santa Clara); 1988; 9():147-60. PubMed ID: 12708425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Who keeps 'Baby M'.
    Kantrowitz B
    Newsweek; 1987 Jan; 109(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 11653747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Confused heritage and the absurdity of genetic ownership.
    Silver LM; Silver SR
    Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):593-618. PubMed ID: 12731550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Artificial reproduction technologies and conflict of laws: an initial approach.
    Grammaticaki-Alexiou A
    LA Law Rev; 2000; 60(4):1113-21. PubMed ID: 12452137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.