159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12466254)
1. Two-view screening and extending the age range: the balance of benefit and risk.
Law J; Faulkner K
Br J Radiol; 2002 Nov; 75(899):889-94. PubMed ID: 12466254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors for induction of breast cancer by X-rays and their implications for breast screening.
Law J; Faulkner K; Young KC
Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):261-6. PubMed ID: 17038413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of benefit:risk ratio and mortality reduction for the UK Breast Screening Programme.
Beckett JR; Kotre CJ; Michaelson JS
Br J Radiol; 2003 May; 76(905):309-20. PubMed ID: 12763946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variations in individual radiation dose in a breast screening programme and consequences for the balance between associated risk and benefit.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):691-8. PubMed ID: 7719682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cancers detected and induced in mammographic screening: new screening schedules and younger women with family history.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Jan; 70():62-9. PubMed ID: 9059297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme.
Heyes GJ; Mill AJ; Charles MW
Br J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 79(939):195-200. PubMed ID: 16498030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of lifetime gained as a result of mammographic breast cancer screening using a computer model.
Jansen JT; Zoetelief J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Jun; 70(834):619-28. PubMed ID: 9227256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Just the facts: mammography saves lives with little if any radiation risk to the mature breast.
Kopans DB
Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):578-82. PubMed ID: 21979544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic screening: is the benefit worth the risk?
Faulkner K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):318-20. PubMed ID: 16464841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The risk of radiation-induced breast cancers due to biennial mammographic screening in women aged 50-69 years is minimal.
Hauge IH; Pedersen K; Olerud HM; Hole EO; Hofvind S
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1174-9. PubMed ID: 24311702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiogenic breast cancer effects of mammographic screening.
Gohagan JK; Darby WP; Spitznagel EL; Monsees BS; Tome AE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1986 Jul; 77(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 3459927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.
Ringash J;
CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 11233866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk and benefit associated with radiation dose in breast screening programmes--an update.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1995 Aug; 68(812):870-6. PubMed ID: 7551785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Routine screening mammography: how important is the radiation-risk side of the benefit-risk equation?
Brenner DJ; Sawant SG; Hande MP; Miller RC; Elliston CD; Fu Z; Randers-Pehrson G; Marino SA
Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Dec; 78(12):1065-7. PubMed ID: 12556334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Radiation risk associated with mammography screening examinations for women younger than 50 years of age].
Nekolla EA; Griebel J; Brix G
Z Med Phys; 2008; 18(3):170-9. PubMed ID: 18826160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancers detected and induced, and associated risk and benefit, in a breast screening programme.
Law J; Faulkner K
Br J Radiol; 2001 Dec; 74(888):1121-7. PubMed ID: 11777770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation benefit and risk at the assessment stage of the UK Breast Screening Programme.
Law J; Faulkner K
Br J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 79(942):479-82. PubMed ID: 16714749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The validation of a simulation model incorporating radiation risk for mammography breast cancer screening in women with a hereditary-increased breast cancer risk.
Greuter MJ; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Jacobi CE; Oosterwijk JC; Jansen L; Oudkerk M; de Bock GH
Eur J Cancer; 2010 Feb; 46(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 19945279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammography-oncogenecity at low doses.
Heyes GJ; Mill AJ; Charles MW
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A123-32. PubMed ID: 19454801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation risk of mammography related to benefit in screening programmes: a favourable balance?
Beemsterboer PM; Warmerdam PG; Boer R; de Koning HJ
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 9718526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
