These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12466924)

  • 1. Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance.
    Hommel B; Eglau B
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):260-73. PubMed ID: 12466924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S; Finkelshtein A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1791-802. PubMed ID: 20952778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Operation compatibility: a neglected contribution to dual-task costs.
    Pannebakker MM; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):447-60. PubMed ID: 19331500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of whole-body vibration on short-term memory.
    Sherwood N; Griffin MJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1990 Dec; 61(12):1092-7. PubMed ID: 2285398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Alderton M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The phonological loop in task alternation and task repetition.
    Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Muyllaert I; Verbruggen F; Vanneste W
    Memory; 2005 Jul; 13(5):550-60. PubMed ID: 16020382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sticky rules: integration between abstract rules and specific actions.
    Mayr U; Bryck RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):337-50. PubMed ID: 15755249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 15709868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Coding specificity of orthogonal S-R compatibility].
    Kleinsorge T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(4):249-64. PubMed ID: 10551040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory.
    Logan GD; Delheimer JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):668-85. PubMed ID: 11394673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Schumacher EH; Schwarb H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-task backward compatibility effects are episodically mediated.
    Giammarco M; Thomson SJ; Watter S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):520-41. PubMed ID: 26572914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance.
    Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1368-84. PubMed ID: 9988597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual priming effects as a measure of short-term visual memory.
    Kroll NE; Schepeler EM
    Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(3):449-68. PubMed ID: 4051041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):274-86. PubMed ID: 12466925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task.
    Ziessler M; Nattkemper D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):595-613. PubMed ID: 11394669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of associative learning on age differences in task-set switching.
    Kray J; Eppinger B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):187-203. PubMed ID: 16564483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working memory, task switching, and executive control in the task span procedure.
    Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Jun; 133(2):218-36. PubMed ID: 15149251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anticipatory response control in motor sequence learning: evidence from stimulus-response compatibility.
    Koch I
    Hum Mov Sci; 2007 Apr; 26(2):257-74. PubMed ID: 17346838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.