649 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12470024)
21. Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5%, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite.
Siqueira JF; Rôças IN; Favieri A; Lima KC
J Endod; 2000 Jun; 26(6):331-4. PubMed ID: 11199749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of instrumentation with two different file types, each with 2.5% NaOCl irrigation on the microhardness of root dentin.
Slutzky-Goldberg I; Liberman R; Heling I
J Endod; 2002 Apr; 28(4):311-2. PubMed ID: 12043870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effectiveness of three instrumentation techniques on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from a root canal: an in vitro study.
Colak M; Evcil S; Bayindir YZ; Yigit N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Feb; 6(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 15719081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Micro-CT analyses of apical enlargement and molar root canal complexity.
Markvart M; Darvann TA; Larsen P; Dalstra M; Kreiborg S; Bjørndal L
Int Endod J; 2012 Mar; 45(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 22044111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation.
van der Sluis LW; Gambarini G; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 16674742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Photodynamic therapy with two different photosensitizers as a supplement to instrumentation/irrigation procedures in promoting intracanal reduction of Enterococcus faecalis.
Souza LC; Brito PR; de Oliveira JC; Alves FR; Moreira EJ; Sampaio-Filho HR; Rôças IN; Siqueira JF
J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 20113793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars.
Paqué F; Al-Jadaa A; Kfir A
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 22188277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the centreing ability of the ProTaper Universal rotary system in curved roots in comparison to Nitiflex files.
Aguiar CM; de Andrade Mendes D; Câmara AC; de Figueiredo JA
Aust Endod J; 2009 Dec; 35(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 19961458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Revascularization and periapical repair after endodontic treatment using apical negative pressure irrigation versus conventional irrigation plus triantibiotic intracanal dressing in dogs' teeth with apical periodontitis.
da Silva LA; Nelson-Filho P; da Silva RA; Flores DS; Heilborn C; Johnson JD; Cohenca N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):779-87. PubMed ID: 20416538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the effect of two endodontic irrigation protocols on the elimination of bacteria from root canal system: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Beus C; Safavi K; Stratton J; Kaufman B
J Endod; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1479-83. PubMed ID: 23063221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Apical pressures developed by needles for canal irrigation.
Bradford CE; Eleazer PD; Downs KE; Scheetz JP
J Endod; 2002 Apr; 28(4):333-5. PubMed ID: 12043877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of instrument size on root canal debridement.
Usman N; Baumgartner JC; Marshall JG
J Endod; 2004 Feb; 30(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 14977309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Apical negative pressure irrigation versus conventional irrigation plus triantibiotic intracanal dressing on root canal disinfection in dog teeth.
Cohenca N; Heilborn C; Johnson JD; Flores DS; Ito IY; da Silva LA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e42-6. PubMed ID: 20123368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bacterial reduction in infected root canals treated with 2.5% NaOCl as an irrigant and calcium hydroxide/camphorated paramonochlorophenol paste as an intracanal dressing.
Siqueira JF; Magalhães KM; Rôças IN
J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17509403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An in vivo evaluation of two types of files used to accurately determine the diameter of the apical constriction of a root canal: an in vivo study.
Darda S; Manwar N; Chandak M; Shori DD
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jul; 10(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 19575053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
