These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1247011)

  • 1. A comparison of four methods for determining prevalence of induced abortion, Taiwan, 1970-1971.
    Rider RV; Harper PA; Chow LP; I-Cheng C
    Am J Epidemiol; 1976 Jan; 103(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 1247011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of 4 methods of determining the incidence of induced abortion].
    Rider RV; Harper PA; Chow LP; I-cheng C
    Estud Poblac; 1979; 4(7-11):41-60. PubMed ID: 12310283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of the randomized response technique in rural Ethiopia.
    Chow LP; Gruhn W; Chang WP
    Am J Public Health; 1979 Mar; 69(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 420374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incidence of induced abortion determined by the randomised response technique.
    Rajapaksa LC; Perera DC
    Ceylon Med J; 1994 Mar; 39(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 8194140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prevalence of Induced Abortion in Iran: A Comparison of Two Indirect Estimation Techniques.
    Ghofrani M; Asghari F; Kashanian M; Zeraati H; Fotouhi A
    Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2018 Jun; 44(2):73-79. PubMed ID: 30475213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A medical record linkage analysis of abortion underreporting.
    Udry JR; Gaughan M; Schwingl PJ; van den Berg BJ
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):228-31. PubMed ID: 8886766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeat induced abortions in Georgia, characteristics of women with multiple pregnancy terminations: secondary analysis of the Reproductive Health Survey 2010.
    Pestvenidze E; Berdzuli N; Lomia N; Gagua T; Umikashvili L; Stray-Pedersen B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():85-90. PubMed ID: 27567533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial.
    Constant D; Harries J; Daskilewicz K; Myer L; Gemzell-Danielsson K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179600. PubMed ID: 28640845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Illegal induced abortion: a study of 74 cases in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
    Okonofua FE; Onwudiegwu U; Odunsi OA
    Trop Doct; 1992 Apr; 22(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 1604719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Induced abortion: reported and observed practice in Taiwan.
    Wang JF
    Health Care Women Int; 1985; 6(5-6):383-404. PubMed ID: 3854323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion surveillance--United States, 2009.
    Pazol K; Creanga AA; Zane SB; Burley KD; Jamieson DJ;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(8):1-44. PubMed ID: 23169413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized trial assessing home use of two pregnancy tests for determining early medical abortion outcomes at 3, 7 and 14days after mifepristone.
    Blum J; Sheldon WR; Ngoc NT; Winikoff B; Nga NT; Martin R; Van Thanh L; Blumenthal PD
    Contraception; 2016 Aug; 94(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 27067706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring the extent of abortion underreporting in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
    Fu H; Darroch JE; Henshaw SK; Kolb E
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(3):128-33, 138. PubMed ID: 9635261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nurses' attitudes to therapeutic abortion.
    Webb C
    Nurs Times; 1985 Jan 2-8; 81(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 3844178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Induced abortion in Greenland].
    Bjerregaard P; Kristensen LM; Kiil-Nielsen J; Egelund B; Kollemorten IK
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Oct; 158(43):6085-9. PubMed ID: 8928293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of recent policy changes on fertility, abortion, and contraceptive use in Romania.
    Serbanescu F; Morris L; Stupp P; Stanescu A
    Stud Fam Plann; 1995; 26(2):76-87. PubMed ID: 7618197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A survey of women undergoing nonmedical induced abortions during 2010-2011 in Beijing].
    Zhang Y; Luo B; Li H; Zhou Y; Zhu L; Liu J
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Aug; 94(29):2304-7. PubMed ID: 25391878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States.
    Finer LB; Frohwirth LF; Dauphinee LA; Singh S; Moore AM
    Contraception; 2006 Oct; 74(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 16982236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision-making preceding induced abortion: a qualitative study of women's experiences in Kisumu, Kenya.
    Rehnström Loi U; Lindgren M; Faxelid E; Oguttu M; Klingberg-Allvin M
    Reprod Health; 2018 Oct; 15(1):166. PubMed ID: 30285768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incidence of induced abortion in Malawi, 2015.
    Polis CB; Mhango C; Philbin J; Chimwaza W; Chipeta E; Msusa A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0173639. PubMed ID: 28369114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.