These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1247047)
1. The Copper T 220C: a new long-acting copper intrauterine contraceptive device. Cooper DL; Millen AK; Mishell DR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jan; 124(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 1247047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three different models of the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device. Roy S; Casagrande J; Cooper DL; Mishell DR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 134(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 453297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices. Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz J; Diaz MM; Faundes A; el Mahgoub S; Diaz S; Pavez M; Coutinho E; Mattos CE Contraception; 1987 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 3111785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Twelve-month comparative multicenter study of the TCu 380A and ML 250 intrauterine devices in Bangkok, Thailand. Reinprayoon D; Gilmore C; Farr G; Amatya R Contraception; 1998 Oct; 58(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 9865999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experience with the copper-T and Silicone Shell Loop in parous women: a randomized study. Roy S; Azen SP; Mishell DR; Pike MC; Casagrande J Contraception; 1976 Mar; 13(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 1248259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term contraception with the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (LNg 20) and the copper T 380Ag intrauterine devices: a five-year randomized study. Sivin I; el Mahgoub S; McCarthy T; Mishell DR; Shoupe D; Alvarez F; Brache V; Jimenez E; Diaz J; Faundes A Contraception; 1990 Oct; 42(4):361-78. PubMed ID: 2124179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and Lippes Loop IUDs in three developing countries. Farr G; Amatya R; Acosta M; Ekwempu C; Kisninci H Contraception; 1995 Jul; 52(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8521710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interactions between intrauterine contraceptive device use and breast-feeding status at time of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: analysis of TCu-380A acceptors in developing countries. Farr G; Rivera R Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 167(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 1442918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial. Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs. Chi IC Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metallic copper as an intrauterine contraceptice adjunct to the "T" device. Zipper JA; Tatum HJ; Pastene L; Medel M; Rivera M Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1969 Dec; 105(8):1274-8. PubMed ID: 5360257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A comparative study of three types of IUD]. Lai KR; Chen QB Shengzhi Yu Biyun; 1991 Nov; 11(4):46-54. PubMed ID: 12284922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The comparative trial of TCu 380A IUD and progesterone-releasing vaginal ring used by lactating women. Chen JH; Wu SC; Shao WQ; Zou MH; Hu J; Cong L; Miao L; Wang C; Dong J; Gao J; Xiao BL Contraception; 1998 Jun; 57(6):371-9. PubMed ID: 9693396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized clinical study of the TCu-380 A and the TCu-200 B. IUDs. Kandil OF; El-sheikha Z; Hamza A Popul Sci; 1991 Jan; 10():35-40. PubMed ID: 12284660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Four years of experience with the TCu 380A intrauterine contraceptive device. Sivin I; Tatum HJ Fertil Steril; 1981 Aug; 36(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 7262334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Four years' experience with the TCu 220C, a long-acting multisleeved copper intrauterine device. Thiery M; Van Der Pas H; Van Kets H; Boogers W; Haspels A; Amy J-j Adv Plan Parent; 1979; 14(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 12335870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rates and outcomes of planned pregnancy after use of Norplant capsules, Norplant II rods, or levonorgestrel-releasing or copper TCu 380Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices. Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz S; Pavéz M; Alvarez F; Brache V; Mishell DR; Lacarra M; McCarthy T; Holma P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Apr; 166(4):1208-13. PubMed ID: 1566771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two years' experience with two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and one copper-releasing intrauterine device: a randomized comparative performance study. Nilsson CG; Allonen H; Diaz J; Luukkainen T Fertil Steril; 1983 Feb; 39(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 6401636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A statistical study of the copper T and copper 7 intrauterine devices. Gupta HD; Gupta I; Devi PK Contraception; 1976 Dec; 14(6):655-60. PubMed ID: 1017199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of client characteristics that may affect early discontinuation of the TCu-380A IUD. Rivera R; Chen-Mok M; McMullen S Contraception; 1999 Sep; 60(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 10640159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]