These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1247047)

  • 21. Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and TCu 220C IUDs in four developing country family planning clinics.
    Farr G; Amatya R; Betancourt JD; David M; Alfonso L; Dacalos E
    Contraception; 1994 Nov; 50(5):417-29. PubMed ID: 7859451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A study of the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device (TCu 200) in nulliparous women.
    Mishell DR; Israel R; Freid N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Aug; 116(8):1092-6. PubMed ID: 4721138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation of the TCu 380Ag and the Multiload Cu375.
    Cole LP; Potts DM; Aranda C; Behlilovic B; Etman ES; Moreno J; Randic L
    Fertil Steril; 1985 Feb; 43(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 3881295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Immediate postplacental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: randomized study.
    Tatum HJ; Beltran RS; Ramos R; Van Kets H; Sivin I; Schmidt FH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Nov; 175(5):1231-5. PubMed ID: 8942493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contraceptive efficacy of the Copper T 380A and Copper T 200 intrauterine devices: results from a comparative clinical trial in six developing countries.
    Farr G; Amatya R
    Contraception; 1994 Mar; 49(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 8200217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Experience with three different models of the Copper T intrauterine contraceptive device in nulliparous women.
    Roy S; Cooper D; Mishell DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Jun; 119(3):414-7. PubMed ID: 4827383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparative study of two techniques used in immediate postplacental insertion (IPPI) of the Copper T-380A IUD in Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
    Xu JX; Rivera R; Dunson TR; Zhuang LQ; Yang XL; Ma GT; Chi IC
    Contraception; 1996 Jul; 54(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8804806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effective contraception with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: 12-month report of a European multicenter study.
    Luukkainen T; Allonen H; Haukkamaa M; Holma P; Pyörälä T; Terho J; Toivonen J; Batar I; Lampe L; Andersson K
    Contraception; 1987 Aug; 36(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 3123132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A three-year study of the copper T 200 intrauterine device.
    Gupta HD; Devi PK
    Contraception; 1976 Aug; 14(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 949893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors affecting intrauterine contraceptive device performance. I. Endometrial cavity length.
    Hasson HM; Berger GS; Edelman DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Dec; 126(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 998687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preliminary report on a postpartum CuT 200 study, Santiago, Chile.
    Lavin P; Waszak C; Bravo C
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1983 Feb; 21(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 6133798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of copper T-200 with Lippes loop as a contraceptive device.
    Wright EA; Aisien OA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Jun; 29(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 2568294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Five years private practice experience of nulliparous women using copper IUD's.
    Smith RP; Goresky DM; Etchell DM
    Contraception; 1980 Apr; 21(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 7389354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intrauterine device developments.
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 12313225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of adding copper onto Lippes Loop IUDs: results from a ten-year study in Yugoslavia.
    Randic L; Haller H; Perovic M; Farr G
    Contraception; 1991 Mar; 43(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2036794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effectiveness of IUDs: a review.
    Sivin I; Schmidt F
    Contraception; 1987 Jul; 36(1):55-84. PubMed ID: 3311626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Do insertion-related problems affect subsequent IUD performance?
    Chi IC; Waszak CS; Wilkens LR
    Contraception; 1986 Nov; 34(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 3816233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A collaborative study of the progesterone intrauterine device (Progestasert). The World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Implantation.
    Newton J; Szontagh F; Lebech P; Rowe P
    Contraception; 1979 Jun; 19(6):575-89. PubMed ID: 487808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A clinical trial of the Delta-T intrauterine device: immediate postpartum insertion.
    Brenner PF
    Contraception; 1983 Aug; 28(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 6357630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices.
    Grimes D; Schulz K; Stanwood N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (3):CD001777. PubMed ID: 12137634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.