These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12471513)

  • 1. [Development of an automatic discrimination system for glaucomatous visual fields based on neuro-fuzzy nets].
    García Feijoó J; Carmona Suárez EJ; Gallardo LM; González Hernández M; Fernández Vidal A; González de la Rosa M; Mira Mira J; García Sánchez J
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2002 Dec; 77(12):669-76. PubMed ID: 12471513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-assisted interpretation of visual fields in glaucoma.
    Asman P
    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (1985); 1992; (206):1-47. PubMed ID: 1467748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity and specificity of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials (SD-tVEP) in discriminating normal from glaucomatous eyes.
    Pillai C; Ritch R; Derr P; Gonzalez A; Kopko Cox L; Siegfried J; Liebmann JM; Tello C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Apr; 54(4):2847-52. PubMed ID: 23513061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of input data on the performance of a neural network in distinguishing normal and glaucomatous visual fields.
    Bengtsson B; Bizios D; Heijl A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 46(10):3730-6. PubMed ID: 16186356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between standard automated perimetry and retinal nerve fiber layer parameters obtained with optical coherence tomography.
    Lopez-Peña MJ; Ferreras A; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pablo LE
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Sep; 20(7):422-32. PubMed ID: 21278593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Wishart PK
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry.
    Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Parisi L; Zeppieri M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 89(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 15665349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of clinicians and an artificial neural network regarding accuracy and certainty in performance of visual field assessment for the diagnosis of glaucoma.
    Andersson S; Heijl A; Bizios D; Bengtsson B
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):413-7. PubMed ID: 22583841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ranking of optic disc variables for detection of glaucomatous optic nerve damage.
    Jonas JB; Bergua A; Schmitz-Valckenberg P; Papastathopoulos KI; Budde WM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1764-73. PubMed ID: 10845597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deep-learning Classifier With an Ultrawide-field Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Detects Glaucoma Visual Field Severity.
    Masumoto H; Tabuchi H; Nakakura S; Ishitobi N; Miki M; Enno H
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Jul; 27(7):647-652. PubMed ID: 29781835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual field indices for the nasal step: different calculation procedures and their correlation with the clinical classification of visual field defects.
    Damms T; Dannheim F; Dannheim D
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 1993; 3(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 8485394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
    Hawkins AS; Szlyk JP; Ardickas Z; Alexander KR; Wilensky JT
    J Glaucoma; 2003 Apr; 12(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 12671468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of a novel population-based regression analysis for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression.
    Kovalska MP; Bürki E; Schoetzau A; Orguel SF; Orguel S; Grieshaber MC
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Apr; 228(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 21484636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [First experience with the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter® on patients with ocular hypertension and preperimetric glaucoma].
    Hasler S; Stürmer J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Apr; 229(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 22495996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma.
    Budenz DL; Michael A; Chang RT; McSoley J; Katz J
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 15629813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using machine learning classifiers to identify glaucomatous change earlier in standard visual fields.
    Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Chan K; Boden C; Lee TW; Vasile C; Boehm AG; Sejnowski T; Johnson CA; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2660-5. PubMed ID: 12147600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic performance of visual field test using subsets of the 24-2 test pattern for early glaucomatous field loss.
    Wang Y; Henson DB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):756-61. PubMed ID: 23258149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.