460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12471524)
1. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G
Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The negative predictive value of electrical impedance scanning in BI-RADS category IV breast lesions.
Fuchsjaeger MH; Flöry D; Reiner CS; Rudas M; Riedl CC; Helbich TH
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):478-85. PubMed ID: 15973141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy--success, histologic accuracy, patient acceptance and optimizing the BI-RADSTM-correlated indication].
Siegmann KC; Wersebe A; Fischmann A; Fersis N; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 12525989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Percutaneous stereotactic biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions using the Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation (ABBI) system: critical evaluation of indication strategies].
Wedegärtner U; Otto U; Buitrago-Tellez C; Bremerich J; Oertli D; Torhorst J; Bongartz G
Rofo; 2001 Mar; 173(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 11293864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Fine needle aspiration biopsy of breast lesions: institutional experience].
Medina-Franco H; Abarca-Pérez L; Cortés-González R; Soto-Germes S; Ulloa JA; Uribe N
Rev Invest Clin; 2005; 57(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 16187698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 concecutive cases of missed breast cancer.
Shah VI; Raju U; Chitale D; Deshpande V; Gregory N; Strand V
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1824-31. PubMed ID: 12673707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Bonifacino A; Petrocelli V; Pisani T; Giannerini S; Giovagnoli A; Vecchione A; Mingazzini PL; Giovagnoli MR
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(3c):2465-70. PubMed ID: 16080477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
Kim H; Cha JH; Oh HY; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 23086698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of electrical impedance scanning (EIS) in the evaluation of BI-RADS III/IV/V-lesions.
Diebold T; Jacobi V; Scholz B; Hensel C; Solbach C; Kaufmann M; Viana F; Balzer J; Peters J; Vogl T
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Feb; 4(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 15649092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions in a rural setting. Comparison of cytology with imaging and final outcome.
Zardawi IM; Hearnden F; Meyer P; Trevan B
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 10097704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
