98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12471527)
1. [Age- and gender-related distribution of bone mineral density and mechanical properties of the proximal humerus].
Lill H; Hepp P; Gowin W; Oestmann JW; Korner J; Haas NP; Josten C; Duda GN
Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1544-50. PubMed ID: 12471527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of bone quality in the proximal humerus by measurement of the contralateral site: a cadaveric analyze.
Diederichs G; Korner J; Goldhahn J; Linke B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Mar; 126(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 16456662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus.
Tingart MJ; Apreleva M; von Stechow D; Zurakowski D; Warner JJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2003 May; 85(4):611-7. PubMed ID: 12793573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. pQCT bone strength index may serve as a better predictor than bone mineral density for long bone breaking strength.
Siu WS; Qin L; Leung KS
J Bone Miner Metab; 2003; 21(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 12928834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proximal femur specimens: automated 3D trabecular bone mineral density analysis at multidetector CT--correlation with biomechanical strength measurement.
Huber MB; Carballido-Gamio J; Bauer JS; Baum T; Eckstein F; Lochmüller EM; Majumdar S; Link TM
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):472-81. PubMed ID: 18430879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dimensions and estimated mechanical characteristics of the humerus after long-term tennis loading.
Haapasalo H; Sievanen H; Kannus P; Heinonen A; Oja P; Vuori I
J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Jun; 11(6):864-72. PubMed ID: 8725185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic morphometry and densitometry predict strength of cadaveric proximal humeri more reliably than age and DXA scan density.
Skedros JG; Knight AN; Pitts TC; O'Rourke PJ; Burkhead WZ
J Orthop Res; 2016 Feb; 34(2):331-41. PubMed ID: 26218571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Normal changes in spinal bone mineral density in a Chinese population: assessment by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Yu W; Qin M; Xu L; van Kuijk C; Meng X; Xing X; Cao J; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 9(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 10367047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distribution of bone mineral density with age and gender in the proximal tibia.
Khodadadyan-Klostermann C; von Seebach M; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Haas NP
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 May; 19(4):370-6. PubMed ID: 15109757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age-related changes in proximal humerus bone health in healthy, white males.
Mantila Roosa SM; Hurd AL; Xu H; Fuchs RK; Warden SJ
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Dec; 23(12):2775-83. PubMed ID: 22258805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of peri-implant bone quality on implant stability.
Schiuma D; Plecko M; Kloub M; Rothstock S; Windolf M; Gueorguiev B
Med Eng Phys; 2013 Jan; 35(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22682925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structural analysis of trabecular bone of the proximal femur using multislice computed tomography: a comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry for predicting biomechanical strength in vitro.
Bauer JS; Kohlmann S; Eckstein F; Mueller D; Lochmüller EM; Link TM
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Feb; 78(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 16467973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between the values of bone measurements using DXA, QCT and USD methods and the bone strength in calcanei in vitro.
Imamoto K; Hamanaka Y; Yamamoto I; Niiho C
Kaibogaku Zasshi; 1998 Oct; 73(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 9844342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical in vitro assessment of screw augmentation in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.
Röderer G; Scola A; Schmölz W; Gebhard F; Windolf M; Hofmann-Fliri L
Injury; 2013 Oct; 44(10):1327-32. PubMed ID: 23769470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-Resolution Tomography-Based Quantification of Cortical Porosity and Cortical Thickness at the Surgical Neck of the Humerus During Aging.
Helfen T; Sprecher CM; Eberli U; Gueorguiev B; Müller PE; Richards RG; Schmidutz F
Calcif Tissue Int; 2017 Sep; 101(3):271-279. PubMed ID: 28432379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of vertebral strength in vitro by spinal bone densitometry and calcaneal ultrasound.
Cheng XG; Nicholson PH; Boonen S; Lowet G; Brys P; Aerssens J; Van der Perre G; Dequeker J
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Oct; 12(10):1721-8. PubMed ID: 9333134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital x-ray radiogrammetry identifies women at risk of osteoporotic fracture: results from a prospective study.
Bach-Mortensen P; Hyldstrup L; Appleyard M; Hindsø K; Gebuhr P; Sonne-Holm S
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Jul; 79(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 16868669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of long-term impact-loading on mass, size, and estimated strength of humerus and radius of female racquet-sports players: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study between young and old starters and controls.
Kontulainen S; Sievänen H; Kannus P; Pasanen M; Vuori I
J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Feb; 18(2):352-9. PubMed ID: 12568413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age- and sex-related changes of humeral head microarchitecture: histomorphometric analysis of 60 human specimens.
Barvencik F; Gebauer M; Beil FT; Vettorazzi E; Mumme M; Rupprecht M; Pogoda P; Wegscheider K; Rueger JM; Pueschel K; Amling M
J Orthop Res; 2010 Jan; 28(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19630001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
