These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12471536)
61. [Current surveillance policy for Barrett's oesophagus in the Netherlands]. Curvers WL; Festen HP; Hameeteman W; Meijer GA; Peters FT; siersema PD; Tilanus HW; Bergman JJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Aug; 151(34):1879-84. PubMed ID: 17902562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. A prospective comparison of performance of biopsy forceps used in single passage with multiple bites during upper endoscopy. Chu KM; Yuen ST; Wong WM; Wong KW; Lai KC; Hu WH; Leung SY; Yuen MF; Lam SK; Wong BC Endoscopy; 2003 Apr; 35(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 12664392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The prevalence of Barrett's oesophagus in a cohort of 1040 Canadian primary care patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia undergoing prompt endoscopy. Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ; Thomson AB; Barkun AN; Armstrong D; Chiba N; White RJ; Escobedo S; Sinclair P Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Mar; 23(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 16480398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. [Barrett's esophagus: endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer]. Bergman JJ; Marsman WA; Krishnadath KK; Fockens P; van Lanschot JJ; Tytgat GN Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Nov; 147(46):2275-81. PubMed ID: 14655293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Prospective evaluation of the macroscopic types and location of early Barrett's neoplasia in 380 lesions. Pech O; Gossner L; Manner H; May A; Rabenstein T; Behrens A; Berres M; Huijsmans J; Vieth M; Stolte M; Ell C Endoscopy; 2007 Jul; 39(7):588-93. PubMed ID: 17611912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Biopsy specimens obtained with small-caliber endoscopes have comparable diagnostic performances than those obtained with conventional endoscopes: a prospective study on 1335 specimens. Walter T; Chesnay AL; Dumortier J; Mège-LeChevallier F; Hervieu V; Guillaud O; Lapalus MG; Lépilliez V; Fumex F; Ponchon T; Scoazec JY J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19661817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Prospective, randomized comparison of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Yang R; Naritoku W; Laine L Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(6):671-4. PubMed ID: 7859962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Wide-area transepithelial sampling in adjunct to forceps biopsy increases the absolute detection rates of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal dysplasia: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Suresh Kumar VC; Harne P; Patthipati VS; Subedi A; Masood U; Sharma A; Goyal F; Aggarwal N; Sapkota B BMJ Open Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 32928869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Oval Cup Forceps Versus Serrated Jaw Forceps in Gastric Biopsy. Sussman DA; Deshpande AR; Shankar U; Barkin JA; Medina AM; Poppiti RJ; Cubeddu LX; Barkin JS Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Aug; 61(8):2338-2343. PubMed ID: 27003145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Ropeway-type bile duct biopsy forceps with a side slit for a guidewire. Tamada K; Higashizawa T; Tomiyama T; Wada S; Ohashi A; Satoh Y; Ido K; Sugano K Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Jan; 53(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 11154498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Comparison of hot versus cold biopsy forceps in the diagnosis of endobronchial lesions]. Firoozbakhsh S; Seifirad S; Safavi E; Dinparast R; Taslimi S; Derakhshandeilami G Arch Bronconeumol; 2011 Nov; 47(11):547-51. PubMed ID: 22036191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. The quality of care in Barrett's esophagus: endoscopist and pathologist practices. Ofman JJ; Shaheen NJ; Desai AA; Moody B; Bozymski EM; Weinstein WM Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Mar; 96(3):876-81. PubMed ID: 11280568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps. Cartwright JA; Hill TL; Smith S; Shaw D J Vet Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 30(4):1002-7. PubMed ID: 27255591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Comparison of different biopsy forceps models for tissue sampling in eosinophilic esophagitis. Bussmann C; Schoepfer AM; Safroneeva E; Haas N; Godat S; Sempoux C; Simon HU; Straumann A Endoscopy; 2016 Dec; 48(12):1069-1075. PubMed ID: 27824401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. A system of multiple biopsy forceps. Taylor TV Curr Surg; 2004; 61(6):594-6. PubMed ID: 15590032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial. Rizzo J; Bernstein D; Gress F Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 10699767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]