These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12472006)

  • 1. Aspects of quality: face-to-face versus teleconsulting.
    Granlund H
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 2003; 32():158-66. PubMed ID: 12472006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient and physician perspectives on teledermatology at an academic dermatology department amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Asabor EN; Bunick CG; Cohen JM; Perkins SH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Jan; 84(1):158-161. PubMed ID: 32946971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The additive value of second opinion teleconsulting in the management of patients with challenging inflammatory, neoplastic skin diseases: a best practice model in dermatology?
    Lozzi GP; Soyer HP; Massone C; Micantonio T; Kraenke B; Fargnoli MC; Fink-Puches R; Binder B; Di Stefani A; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Peris K
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 17207164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Let us not forget the importance of a face-to-face consultation in the Covid-19 era: A dermatology perspective.
    Hussain K; Borysiewicz C
    Dermatol Ther; 2020 Nov; 33(6):e14245. PubMed ID: 32860337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic value of written referral and/or images for skin lesions.
    Oakley AM; Reeves F; Bennett J; Holmes SH; Wickham H
    J Telemed Telecare; 2006; 12(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 16638237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient satisfaction with teledermatology is related to perceived quality of life.
    Williams TL; Esmail A; May CR; Griffiths CE; Shaw NT; Fitzgerald D; Stewart E; Mould M; Morgan M; Pickup L; Kelly S
    Br J Dermatol; 2001 Dec; 145(6):911-7. PubMed ID: 11899144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of an Internet-based teledermatology system.
    Chao LW; Cestari TF; Bakos L; Oliveira MR; Miot HA; Zampese M; Andrade CB; Böhm GM
    J Telemed Telecare; 2003; 9 Suppl 1():S9-12. PubMed ID: 12952705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Store-and-forward teledermatology: assessment of validity in a series of 2000 observations].
    Vañó-Galván S; Hidalgo A; Aguayo-Leiva I; Gil-Mosquera M; Ríos-Buceta L; Plana MN; Zamora J; Martorell-Calatayud A; Jaén P
    Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2011 May; 102(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 21376296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Teledermatology in Missouri and beyond.
    Edison KE; Dyer JA
    Mo Med; 2007; 104(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 17536443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Teledermatology saves both time and money. Better utilization of physicians, shorter waiting lists].
    Ekholm E
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Oct; 99(41):4044-6. PubMed ID: 12451941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health-care delivery methods in teledermatology: consultative, triage and direct-care models.
    Pathipati AS; Lee L; Armstrong AW
    J Telemed Telecare; 2011; 17(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 21508078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Remote interpretation in medical encounters: a systematic review.
    Azarmina P; Wallace P
    J Telemed Telecare; 2005; 11(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 15901441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Teledermatology: an intraobserver diagnostic correlation study, part I.
    Pak HS; Harden D; Cruess D; Welch ML; Poropatich R;
    Cutis; 2003 May; 71(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 12769408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating a telemedicine system to assist in the management of dermatology referrals.
    Taylor P; Goldsmith P; Murray K; Harris D; Barkley A
    Br J Dermatol; 2001 Feb; 144(2):328-33. PubMed ID: 11251567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of teleconsultations versus face-to-face consultations.
    Nordal EJ; Moseng D; Kvammen B; Løchen ML
    J Telemed Telecare; 2001; 7(5):257-65. PubMed ID: 11571079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Teledermatology.
    Whited JD
    Med Clin North Am; 2015 Nov; 99(6):1365-79, xiv. PubMed ID: 26476258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dermatology consultation reduces interruption of oncologic management among hospitalized patients with immune-related adverse events: A retrospective cohort study.
    Chen ST; Molina GE; Lo JA; Durbin S; Cohen JV; Reynolds KL; Kroshinsky D
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Apr; 82(4):994-996. PubMed ID: 31560981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient cost-benefits of realtime teledermatology--a comparison of data from Northern Ireland and New Zealand.
    Oakley AM; Kerr P; Duffill M; Rademaker M; Fleischl P; Bradford N; Mills C
    J Telemed Telecare; 2000; 6(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 10824377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comment on the editorial "emergency call: limits and risks"].
    Von Overbeck J; Blozik E
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2010 Dec; 99(24):1451-2; author reply 1452. PubMed ID: 21125529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two years' experience with Web-based teleconsulting in dermatology.
    Massone C; Soyer HP; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Di Stefani A; Lozzi GP; Gabler G; Dong H; Argenziano G; Ozdemir F; Fink-Puches R; Salmhofer W; Zalaudek I; Nunzi E; Kerl H
    J Telemed Telecare; 2006; 12(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 16539755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.