282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12472082)
1. What should IRBs consider when applying the privacy rule to research?
Gerlach JW
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2002 Sep; 12(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 12472082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. New privacy rule has more tasks for IRBs.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):4. PubMed ID: 12530379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Institutional review boards and the new privacy rule.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11833565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HIPAA and what institutional review boards (IRBs) do not have to review.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Dec; 18(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 15027429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The use and disclosure of protected health information for research under the HIPAA privacy rule: unrealized patient autonomy and burdensome government regulation.
Tovino SA
S D Law Rev; 2004; 49(3):447-502. PubMed ID: 16493842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of the new federal medical-privacy rule on research.
Kulynych J; Korn D
N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 11796857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Exempt" research after the privacy rule.
Barnes M; Gallin KE
IRB; 2003; 25(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 14649247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. US privacy laws may curb access to medical data.
Wadman M
Nature; 1997 Apr; 386(6625):533. PubMed ID: 9121564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical privacy and medical research--judging the new federal regulations.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 11796863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Registry research and medical privacy.
Ingelfinger JR; Drazen JM
N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(14):1452-3. PubMed ID: 15070797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Privacy bill under fire from researchers.
Wadman M
Nature; 1998 Mar; 392(6671):6. PubMed ID: 9510231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The IRB process needs to be reexamined.
Esaki R; Macario A; Harrison TK; Brock-Utne JG
Anesth Analg; 2011 May; 112(5):1249-50. PubMed ID: 21515655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Privacy, protected information, & research.
IRB; 2002; 24(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 14509293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Personal privacy and common goods: a framework for balancing under the national health information privacy rule.
Gostin LO; Hodge JG
Minn Law Rev; 2002 Jun; 86(6):1439-79. PubMed ID: 15174439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Practice brief. Regulations governing research.
Burrington-Brown J; Wagg DG;
J AHIMA; 2003 Mar; 74(3):suppl 56A-56D. PubMed ID: 12914353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How research will adapt to HIPAA: a view from within the healthcare delivery system.
Durham ML
Am J Law Med; 2002; 28(4):491-502. PubMed ID: 12516178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Uncovering the relationship between IRBs and the HIPAA privacy rule.
Gilles K
J AHIMA; 2004; 75(10):48-9, 52; quiz 55-6. PubMed ID: 15559839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New review burdens will affect many institutional review boards (IRBs).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jul; 16(7):9. PubMed ID: 11933956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulating clinical research: informed consent, privacy, and IRBS.
Hoffman S
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2004 Feb; (298):9-29. PubMed ID: 15233002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
