BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12473411)

  • 1. Scientific criteria used for the development of occupational exposure limits for metals and other mining-related chemicals.
    Haber LT; Maier A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Dec; 36(3):262-79. PubMed ID: 12473411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Global Landscape of Occupational Exposure Limits--Implementation of Harmonization Principles to Guide Limit Selection.
    Deveau M; Chen CP; Johanson G; Krewski D; Maier A; Niven KJ; Ripple S; Schulte PA; Silk J; Urbanus JH; Zalk DM; Niemeier RW
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12 Suppl 1(sup1):S127-44. PubMed ID: 26099071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Approaches for the setting of occupational exposure limits (OELs) for carcinogens.
    Högberg J; Järnberg J
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2023 Dec; 53(3):131-167. PubMed ID: 37366107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Occupational exposure limits for manufactured nanomaterials, a systematic review.
    Mihalache R; Verbeek J; Graczyk H; Murashov V; van Broekhuizen P
    Nanotoxicology; 2017 Feb; 11(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 27894206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Derivation of occupational exposure limits: Differences in methods and protection levels.
    Schneider K; Dilger M; Drossard C; Ott H; Kaiser E
    J Appl Toxicol; 2022 May; 42(5):913-926. PubMed ID: 35188277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misinterpretation and misuse of exposure limits.
    Hewett P
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Feb; 16(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 11217719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Industry Derived Occupational Exposure Limits: A Survey of Professionals on the Dutch System of Exposure Guidelines.
    Schenk L; Visser MJ; Palmen NGM
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Nov; 63(9):1004-1012. PubMed ID: 31504142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Will worker DNELs derived under the European REACH regulation extend the landscape of occupational exposure guidance values?
    Schenk L; Johanson G
    Arch Toxicol; 2019 May; 93(5):1187-1200. PubMed ID: 30993379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A quantitative comparison of the safety margins in the european indicative occupational exposure limits and the derived no-effect levels for workers under REACH.
    Schenk L; Johanson G
    Toxicol Sci; 2011 Jun; 121(2):408-16. PubMed ID: 21389111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Scientific Basis of Uncertainty Factors Used in Setting Occupational Exposure Limits.
    Dankovic DA; Naumann BD; Maier A; Dourson ML; Levy LS
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12 Suppl 1(sup1):S55-68. PubMed ID: 26097979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extensive changes to occupational exposure limits in Korea.
    Jeong JY; Choi S; Kho YL; Kim PG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 20709131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of the benchmark-dose (BMD) approach to derive occupational exposure limits (OELs) for genotoxic carcinogens: N-nitrosamines.
    Blum K; FitzGerald R; Wilks MF; Barle EL; Hopf NB
    J Appl Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 43(8):1183-1200. PubMed ID: 36840679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of a framework for the selection of an appropriate occupational exposure limit for manganese.
    Deveau M; Maier A; Krewski D
    Neurotoxicology; 2017 Jan; 58():249-256. PubMed ID: 27663849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Japan.
    Takahashi K; Higashi T
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 16510222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Setting occupational exposure limits for antimicrobial agents: A case study based on a quaternary ammonium compound-based disinfectant.
    Dotson GS; Lotter JT; Zisook RE; Gaffney SH; Maier A; Colvin J
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2020 Sep; 36(9):619-633. PubMed ID: 33241765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic considerations when deriving health-based exposure limits for pharmaceuticals.
    Reichard JF; Maier MA; Naumann BD; Pecquet AM; Pfister T; Sandhu R; Sargent EV; Streeter AJ; Weideman PA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Aug; 79 Suppl 1():S67-78. PubMed ID: 27224509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occupational exposure limits: a comparative study.
    Schenk L; Hansson SO; Rudén C; Gilek M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Mar; 50(2):261-70. PubMed ID: 18226844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of REACH-derived no-effect levels for workers with EU indicative occupational exposure limit values and national limit values in Finland.
    Tynkkynen S; Santonen T; Stockmann-Juvala H
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 25638729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experiencing a probabilistic approach to clarify and disclose uncertainties when setting occupational exposure limits.
    Vernez D; Fraize-Frontier S; Vincent R; Binet S; Rousselle C
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 31(4):475-489. PubMed ID: 29546881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.