BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12474529)

  • 1. A validation of two preoperative nomograms predicting recurrence following radical prostatectomy in a cohort of European men.
    Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Cagiannos I; Hammerer PG; Haese A; Palisaar J; Fernandez S; Noldus J; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
    Urol Oncol; 2002; 7(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 12474529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Can nomograms derived in the U.S. applied to German patients? A study about the validation of preoperative nomograms predicting the risk of recurrence after radical prostatectomy].
    Graefen M; Augustin H; Karakiewicz PI; Hammerer PG; Haese A; Palisaar J; Fernandez S; Noldus J; Erbersdobler A; Cagiannos I; Scardino PT; Kattan MW; Huland H
    Urologe A; 2003 May; 42(5):685-92. PubMed ID: 12750804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of two preoperative Kattan nomograms predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer in Turkey: a multicenter study of the Uro-oncology Society.
    Eskicorapci SY; Türkeri L; Karabulut E; Cal C; Akpinar H; Baltaci S; Baykal K; ; Kattan MW; Ozen H
    Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1289-95. PubMed ID: 19589584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-cultural validation of a prognostic tool: example of the Kattan preoperative nomogram as a predictor of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Rouprêt M; Hupertan V; Comperat E; Drouin SJ; Phé V; Xylinas E; Demanse D; Sibony M; Richard F; Cussenot O
    BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(6):813-7; discussion 817-8. PubMed ID: 19254280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How far is the preoperative Kattan nomogram applicable for the prediction of recurrence after prostatectomy in patients presenting with PSA levels of more than 20 ng/ml? A validation study.
    May M; Gunia S; Helke C; Führer S; Hoschke B; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Siegsmund M
    Urol Int; 2006; 77(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 17033209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. External validation of a preoperative nomogram for prediction of the risk of recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Isbarn H; Karakiewicz PI; Walz J; Ahyai SA; Steuber T; Haese A; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Eichelberg C; Heuer R; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Chun FK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jul; 77(3):788-92. PubMed ID: 19818565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of three risk assessment tools in Australian patients with prostate cancer.
    Tamblyn DJ; Chopra S; Yu C; Kattan MW; Pinnock C; Kopsaftis T
    BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108 Suppl 2():51-6. PubMed ID: 22085129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of PSA and prostate-specific membrane antigen mRNA to detect circulating tumor cells improves recurrence-free survival nomogram prediction after radical prostatectomy.
    Yates DR; Rouprêt M; Drouin SJ; Comperat E; Ricci S; Lacave R; Sèbe P; Cancel-Tassin G; Bitker MO; Cussenot O
    Prostate; 2012 Sep; 72(12):1382-8. PubMed ID: 22228175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. External validation of the Briganti nomogram to estimate the probability of specimen-confined disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
    Roumiguié M; Beauval JB; Filleron T; Benoit T; Rischmann P; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Soulié M; Malavaud B; Ploussard G
    BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E113-E119. PubMed ID: 24684584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. External validation of preoperative nomograms predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Tanaka A; Ohori M; Paul L; Yu C; Kattan MW; Ohno Y; Tachibana M
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 43(12):1255-60. PubMed ID: 24146147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A proposal of a new nomogram for predicting upstaging in contemporary D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer patients.
    Leyh-Bannurah SR; Dell'Oglio P; Tian Z; Schiffmann J; Shariat SF; Suardi N; Francesco M; Alberto B; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Budäus L; Karakiewicz PI
    World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):189-197. PubMed ID: 27289238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying the Most Informative Prediction Tool for Cancer-specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy: Comparative Analysis of Three Commonly Used Preoperative Prediction Models.
    Boehm K; Larcher A; Beyer B; Tian Z; Tilki D; Steuber T; Karakiewicz PI; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Budäus L
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1038-43. PubMed ID: 26272236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ability of 2 pretreatment risk assessment methods to predict prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy: data from CaPSURE.
    Mitchell JA; Cooperberg MR; Elkin EP; Lubeck DP; Mehta SS; Kane CJ; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1126-31. PubMed ID: 15758720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of the Kattan nomogram across prostate cancer risk-groups.
    Korets R; Motamedinia P; Yeshchina O; Desai M; McKiernan JM
    BJU Int; 2011 Jul; 108(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 21062396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimum Tools for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of Prognostic Accuracy and Validity.
    Campbell JM; Raymond E; O'Callaghan ME; Vincent AD; Beckmann KR; Roder D; Evans S; McNeil J; Millar J; Zalcberg J; Borg M; Moretti KL
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Oct; 15(5):e827-e834. PubMed ID: 28666689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and gleason score for predicting prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
    Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1165-70. PubMed ID: 15596191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. External validation and comparison of two nomograms predicting the probability of Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology in two patient populations: a retrospective cohort study.
    Utsumi T; Oka R; Endo T; Yano M; Kamijima S; Kamiya N; Fujimura M; Sekita N; Mikami K; Hiruta N; Suzuki H
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 45(11):1091-5. PubMed ID: 26292699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The CPC Risk Calculator: A New App to Predict Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence During Follow-up After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Røder MA; Berg KD; Loft MD; Thomsen FB; Ferrari M; Kurbegovic S; Rytgaard HC; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Gerds TA; Kjær A; Brooks JD; Iversen P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Apr; 4(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 28753827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Saad F; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
    J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):601-7; discussion 607-8. PubMed ID: 19084864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the Kattan Nomogram for Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Ondracek RP; Kattan MW; Murekeyisoni C; Yu C; Kauffman EC; Marshall JR; Mohler JL
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2016 Nov; 14(11):1395-1401. PubMed ID: 27799510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.