These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12474832)
1. Review boards pose threat to tough work by social scientists. Begley S Wall St J (East Ed); 2002 Nov; ():B1. PubMed ID: 12474832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm? Nelson CH; McPherson DH NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: where should we go from here? De Vries R; DeBruin DA; Goodgame A Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 16625729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The forum. The importance of context in international research. Brunger F; Weijer C Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(4):371-2, 384-7. PubMed ID: 12678077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The forum. Mistaking procedural requirements for ethical standards. Macklin R Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(4):371-2, 378-82. PubMed ID: 12678075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The forum. "Well, what we got here is a failure to communicate": revisiting and reviewing the reviewers of research. Rubin SS Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(4):371-2, 382-4. PubMed ID: 12678076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rethinking protections for human subjects. Gunsalus CK Chron High Educ; 2002 Nov; 49(12):B34. PubMed ID: 15287114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Teaching research ethics: illustrating the nature of the researcher-IRB relationship. Brinthaupt TM Teach Psychol; 2002; 29(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 15295829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protecting the human subjects of social science research--the role of institutional review boards. Reynolds D Bioethics Forum; 2000; 16(4):31-6. PubMed ID: 11902182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Community-based research ethics review: reflections on experience and recommendations for action. Downie J; Cottrell B Health Law Rev; 2001; 10(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 15739305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Social experiments and prior ethical review: the Judicial Conference experiment. Robertson JA IRB; 1981 Apr; 3(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 11661943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The forum. The challenges of cross-cultural research in the international setting. Crosby S; Grodin MA Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(4):371-2, 376-8. PubMed ID: 12678074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Social scientists form committee to protest proposed regulations. IRB; 1979 Dec; 1(8):7. PubMed ID: 11661792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Human ethics review and social sciences: several emerging ethical issues. Bouma GD; Diemer K Monash Bioeth Rev; 1996 Jan; 15(1):S10-6. PubMed ID: 15810188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interviews that do not require review by IRBs. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Dec; 18(12):3. PubMed ID: 15027430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychological and social risks of behavioral research. Labott SM; Johnson TP IRB; 2004; 26(3):11-5. PubMed ID: 15281195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Module five: implementation of ethics review. Dhai A Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An ethics committee reflects; and research in the place where you work--some responses. Westhead H; Meyer J Bull Med Ethics; 2003 May; (188):20-2; author reply 22. PubMed ID: 14983862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Transforming a personal inquiry into a research project: case study. Pattullo EL IRB; 1981 Apr; 3(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 11661945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Where the innocent bear the consequences: lessons from an institution's IRB crisis. Warner RS Bull Park Ridge Cent; 2000; (18):11-2. PubMed ID: 15744913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]