238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12474834)
1. Court upholds state access to abortion clinic records.
N Y Times Web; 2002 Sep; ():A18. PubMed ID: 12474834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinics' bid to withhold abortion files is criticized.
Wilgoren J
N Y Times Web; 2005 Mar; ():A15. PubMed ID: 15948331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Kansas' top court limits abortion record search; attorney general's inquiry will continue.
Rudoren J
N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A7. PubMed ID: 16502527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Court ruling limits prosecutors' access to patient records.
Worth RF
N Y Times Web; 2002 Oct; ():B8. PubMed ID: 12474843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Taking the sting out of reporting requirements: reproductive health clinics and the constitutional right to informational privacy.
Bodger JA
Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):583-609. PubMed ID: 17302004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Practice brief. Redisclosure of patient health information (updated).
American Health Information Management Association
J AHIMA; 2003 Apr; 74(4):56A-56C. PubMed ID: 12698943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Use and disclosure of health information in genetic research: weighing the impact of the new federal medical privacy rule.
Kulynych J; Korn D
Am J Law Med; 2002; 28(2-3):309-24. PubMed ID: 12197467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Privacy rights in personal information: HIPAA and the privacy gap between fundamental privacy rights and medical information.
Davis KB
John Marshall J Comput Inf Law; 2001; 19(4):535-55. PubMed ID: 16331877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Synopsis of state case and statutory law.
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2002; 2(2):365-446. PubMed ID: 14606496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Protection in eye of beholder. Courts send mixed messages about the sanctity of medical files in the face of federal subpoenas for patients' abortion records.
Taylor M
Mod Healthc; 2004 Apr; 34(14):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 15095491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the privacy rule hinder patient care?
Burrington-Brown J
J AHIMA; 2004 Oct; 75(9):72-3, 76. PubMed ID: 15508324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. I want my information back: evidentiary privilege following the partial birth abortion cases.
Silfen M
J Health Law; 2005; 38(1):121-35. PubMed ID: 15968942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder Patient Records. Final rule.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, HHS
Fed Regist; 2017 Jan; 82(11):6052-127. PubMed ID: 28102997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Access to health care records after death: balancing confidentiality with appropriate disclosure.
Robinson DJ; O'Neill D
JAMA; 2007 Feb; 297(6):634-6. PubMed ID: 17299198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Confidentiality of medical information after death.
Sade RM
JAMA; 2007 Jun; 297(23):2585; author reply 2585. PubMed ID: 17579226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health and human services' privacy proposal: a failed attempt at health information privacy protection.
Zoeller B
Brandeis Law J; 2002; 40(4):1065-84. PubMed ID: 12705241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Don't let fear of HIPAA keep you from crucial data.
Rovner JA
Manag Care; 2003 Mar; 12(3):56-7. PubMed ID: 12685378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
Silver SA
Ohio State Law J; 1998; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prescribing privacy: the uncertain role of the physician in the protection of patient privacy.
Gellman RM
North Carol Law Rev; 1984 Jan; 62(2):255-94. PubMed ID: 16100795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical data: does patient privacy trump access for research?
O'Dowd A
BMJ; 2013 Sep; 347():f5516. PubMed ID: 24026467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
