366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12475166)
21. Lethal photosensitization and guided bone regeneration in treatment of peri-implantitis: an experimental study in dogs.
Shibli JA; Martins MC; Ribeiro FS; Garcia VG; Nociti FH; Marcantonio E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 16672022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Er:Yag Laser application on titanium implant surfaces contaminated by Porphyromonas gingivalis: an histomorphometric evaluation.
Quaranta A; Maida C; Scrascia A; Campus G; Quaranta M
Minerva Stomatol; 2009; 58(7-8):317-30. PubMed ID: 19633633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vitro evaluation of the biocompatibility of contaminated implant surfaces treated with an Er : YAG laser and an air powder system.
Kreisler M; Kohnen W; Christoffers AB; Götz H; Jansen B; Duschner H; d'Hoedt B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 15642029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Heat transfer of impression plasters to an implant-bone interface.
Nissan J; Gross M; Ormianer Z; Barnea E; Assif D
Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 16569966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sandblasted and acid-etched dental implants: a histologic study in rats.
Marinho VC; Celletti R; Bracchetti G; Petrone G; Minkin C; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 12608672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of Nd: YAG laser on titanium dental implants studied by AFM.
Vassalli M; Giannelli M
Ital J Anat Embryol; 2003; 108(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 14974502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
Fawzy AS; Amer MA
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 1. Surface analysis.
Morra M; Cassinelli C; Bruzzone G; Carpi A; Di Santi G; Giardino R; Fini M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12608667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In vivo changes in dental implant temperatures during hot beverage intake: a pilot study.
Ormianer Z; Feuerstein O; Assad R; Samet N; Weiss EI
Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 19212236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of Er:YAG laser to improve osseointegration of titanium alloy implants--a comparison of bone healing.
Kesler G; Romanos G; Koren R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 16796279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants.
Jeffcoat MK; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Proskin HM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12814316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of the Nd:YAG dental laser on plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium dental implants: surface alteration and attempted sterilization.
Block CM; Mayo JA; Evans GH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 1299639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Temperature rise during Er:YAG and Nd:YAP laser ablation of dentin.
Armengol V; Jean A; Marion D
J Endod; 2000 Mar; 26(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 11199705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of bone sialoprotein and collagen coating on cell attachment to TICER and pure titanium implant surfaces.
Graf HL; Stoeva S; Armbruster FP; Neuhaus J; Hilbig H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):634-40. PubMed ID: 18343095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations.
Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Morgese F; Squillace A
Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 19231787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of heat conduction in dental implants after exposure to hot beverages.
Livne S; Harel N; Piek D; Ormianer Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 24262947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of modifications of dual acid-etched implant surfaces on periimplant bone formation. Part II: calcium phosphate coatings.
Schliephake H; Aref A; Scharnweber D; Rösler S; Sewing A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19126106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics.
Lumbikanonda N; Sammons R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):627-36. PubMed ID: 11669244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
