124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12475576)
1. Misoprostol and dinoprostone therapy for labor induction: a Doppler comparison of uterine and fetal hemodynamic effects.
Urban R; Lemancewicz A; Urban J; Skotnicki MZ; Kretowska M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Jan; 106(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 12475576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uterine and fetal Doppler flow changes after misoprostol and oxytocin therapy for induction of labor in post-term pregnancies.
Lemancewicz A; Urban R; Skotnicki MZ; Karpiuk A; Urban J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1999 Dec; 67(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 10659896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is there any relation between development of persistent non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern and acutely increased uterine artery vascular flow resistance during dinoprostone use in prolonged pregnancies?
Karcaaltincaba D; Akdag D; Kandemir O; Yalvac S; Guven ES; Haberal A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(8):894-900. PubMed ID: 19562559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening.
Charoenkul S; Sripramote M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1026-34. PubMed ID: 11075969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of uterine and fetal hemodynamics in response to labor induction with dinoprostone in prolonged pregnancies with normal amniotic fluid and oligohydramnios.
Cırık DA; Taşkın EA; Karcaaltıncaba D; Dai Ö
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 May; 27(7):691-5. PubMed ID: 24003884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction of labor in twin pregnancies with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone--is it effective and safe?
Huber G; Schütz H; Seelbach-Göbel B
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jun; 28(9):1043-6. PubMed ID: 25001425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term.
Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Otigbah CM; Howard RJ; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 11844203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Misoprostol for induction of labor with a live fetus.
Weeks A; Alfirevic Z; Faúndes A; Hofmeyr GJ; Safar P; Wing D
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Dec; 99 Suppl 2():S194-7. PubMed ID: 17961564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction.
Garry D; Figueroa R; Kalish RB; Catalano CJ; Maulik D
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 12854927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress.
Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Sénat MV; Bretelle F; Paule Bonnal A; Ville Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 15295374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
