These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12475576)

  • 21. A randomised double-blind study of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction in prolonged pregnancy.
    Lee HY
    Singapore Med J; 1997 Jul; 38(7):292-4. PubMed ID: 9339095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix.
    Bolnick JM; Velazquez MD; Gonzalez JL; Rappaport VJ; McIlwain-Dunivan G; Rayburn WF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 14749647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.
    Lapuente-Ocamica O; Ugarte L; Lopez-Picado A; Sanchez-Refoyo F; Lasa IL; Echevarria O; Álvarez-Sala J; Fariñas A; Bilbao I; Barbero L; Vicarregui J; Hernanz Chaves R; Paz Corral D; Lopez-Lopez JA
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30621614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Langenegger EJ; Odendaal HJ; Grové D
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Mar; 88(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 15733875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Nunes F; Rodrigues R; Meirinho M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Initial clinical experience with a misoprostol vaginal insert in comparison with a dinoprostone insert for inducing labor.
    Mayer RB; Oppelt P; Shebl O; Pömer J; Allerstorfer C; Weiss C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():89-93. PubMed ID: 26995147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of labour induction with misoprostol and dinoprostone and characterization of uterine response based on electrohysterogram.
    Benalcazar-Parra C; Monfort-Orti R; Ye-Lin Y; Prats-Boluda G; Alberola-Rubio J; Perales A; Garcia-Casado J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(10):1586-1594. PubMed ID: 29251182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Jones MM; Rahall A; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1804-10. PubMed ID: 7778636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Doppler evaluation of the effects of propofol, etomidate and alphaxalone on fetoplacental circulation hemodynamics in the pregnant ewe.
    Domínguez E; Rivera Del Álamo MM; Novellas R; Espada Y; Santos L; García F; Andaluz A; Fresno L
    Placenta; 2013 Sep; 34(9):738-44. PubMed ID: 23834950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of misoprostol and prostaglandin E(2) in the preinduction and induction of labor.
    Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B; Laskowska M; Oleszczuk J
    Med Sci Monit; 2001; 7(5):1023-8. PubMed ID: 11535953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents.
    Ramsey PS; Harris DY; Ogburn PL; Heise RH; Magtibay PM; Ramin KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 188(2):560-5. PubMed ID: 12592272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices.
    Buser D; Mora G; Arias F
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):581-5. PubMed ID: 9083316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of methyldopa treatment on uterine, umblical and fetal middle cerebral artery blood flows in preeclamptic patients.
    Günenç O; Ciçek N; Görkemli H; Celik C; Acar A; Akyürek C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2002 Jul; 266(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 12197552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA; Alsibiani S; Mansouri N; Alsinani N; Darhouse K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dinoprostone compared with misoprostol for cervical ripening for induction of labor at term.
    Church S; Van Meter A; Whitfield R
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(5):405-411. PubMed ID: 19720343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination and effect on Doppler measurements.
    Karsidag AY; Buyukbayrak EE; Kars B; Dansuk R; Unal O; Turan MC
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 106(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 19428005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dinoprostone versus misoprostol: a randomized study of nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor.
    Lokugamage AU; Forsyth SF; Sullivan KR; El Refaey H; Rodeck CH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Feb; 82(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 12648174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.