These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
822 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12476088)
1. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response. Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures. Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? Part 2: On electrically evoked late auditory responses. Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):44-57. PubMed ID: 17350776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children. Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses for lateral and medial placement of the Clarion HiFocus electrode. Firszt JB; Wackym PA; Gaggl W; Burg LS; Reeder RM Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 12677114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception. Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children. Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception. Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users. Kirby B; Brown C; Abbas P; Etler C; O'Brien S Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 22246138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Detection of the electric brain stem auditory response before cochlear implantation and its significance]. Wang B; Cao KL; Wei CG; Wang Y; Li H Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):826-831. PubMed ID: 27938608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra-operative recordings of electrically evoked auditory nerve action potentials in young children by use of neural response telemetry with the nucleus C124M cochlear implant. Mason SM; Cope Y; Garnham J; O'Donoghue GM; Gibbin KP Br J Audiol; 2001 Aug; 35(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 11694097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study. Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony. Runge-Samuelson CL; Drake S; Wackym PA Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation]. Wang B; Cao KL; Wang Y; Lu Y Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of modulating phase duration on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses obtained during cochlear implantation. Bonne NX; Douchement D; Hosana G; Desruelles J; Fayoux P; Ruzza I; Vincent C Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May; 16(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 25167217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]