These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12476126)

  • 1. Research nurse who falsified the results of research.
    Castledine G
    Br J Nurs; 2002 Sep 26-Oct 9; 11(17):1119. PubMed ID: 12476126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Critiquing research for use in practice.
    Dale JC
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 15867836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of mentors in promoting integrity and preventing scientific misconduct in nursing research.
    Wocial LD
    J Prof Nurs; 1995; 11(5):276-80. PubMed ID: 7593971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-informed midwifery. 2. Using research in midwifery practice.
    Wickham S
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 1999; (52):39-41. PubMed ID: 11051985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical issues in research: scientific misconduct and fraud.
    Fry ST
    Nurs Outlook; 1990; 38(6):296. PubMed ID: 2235540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preventing scientific misconduct--times have changed.
    Tilden VP
    Nurs Res; 2000; 49(5):243. PubMed ID: 11009117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vascular nursing research review: 1980--1990.
    Wipke-Tevis DD
    J Vasc Nurs; 1992 Sep; 10(3):2-7. PubMed ID: 1390201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What future for research in mental health nursing: share the objective statistics!
    Parsons S
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 1998 Jun; 5(3):233-4. PubMed ID: 9807359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical reading.
    Price A; Price B
    Mod Midwife; 1996 Jul; 6(7):26-9. PubMed ID: 8852186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Case-control design: an appropriate strategy for nursing research.
    Polivka BJ; Nickel JT
    Nurs Res; 1992; 41(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 1482502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating research.
    Haughey B
    Clin Nurse Spec; 1994 Jul; 8(4):195, 207. PubMed ID: 8055416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating quantitative research designs: Part 2.
    Haughey BP
    Crit Care Nurse; 1994 Dec; 14(6):69-72. PubMed ID: 7712803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fraud is a serious offence in nursing.
    Cunningham F
    Br J Nurs; 2002 Oct 10-23; 11(18):1178; author reply 1178. PubMed ID: 12412603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weighing up research.
    Joseph S
    Nurs Stand; 2009 Mar 18-24; 23(28):61. PubMed ID: 19400372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation Research.
    Connelly LM
    Medsurg Nurs; 2015; 24(1):60, 34. PubMed ID: 26306359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating research: what it means to you.
    Maklebust J; Margolis DJ
    Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(4):4, 6. PubMed ID: 9306780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Theoretic orientation and body of knowledge.
    Grant RE
    Heart Lung; 1991 Jul; 20(4):427. PubMed ID: 2071438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reviewing a manuscript for publication: how do I do this?
    Koop PP
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10703301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stemming the tide of disreputable science: implications for nursing.
    Denham SA
    Nurs Forum; 1993; 28(2):11-8. PubMed ID: 8367335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and validity in research.
    Roberts P; Priest H
    Nurs Stand; 2006 Jul 12-18; 20(44):41-5. PubMed ID: 16872117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.