These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12476139)
41. The decline of judicial deference to medical opinion in medical negligence litigation in Malaysia. Kassim PN Med Law; 2008 Jun; 27(2):307-24. PubMed ID: 18693483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Negligence, malpractice and dento-legal risk management. Hartshorne JE J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Sep; 48(9):529-32. PubMed ID: 9508967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Understanding the legal duty of care in the course of negligence. Tingle J Br J Nurs; 2002 Sep 12-25; 11(16):1065-7. PubMed ID: 12362133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Midwifery negligence: a case study. Mair JL Aust Coll Midwives Inc J; 1997 Dec; 10(4):27-30. PubMed ID: 9555373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [The physician as an expert in medical negligence cases]. Giard RW; Stolker CJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Apr; 147(17):819-23. PubMed ID: 12741173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The malpractice crisis in obstetrics and gynecology: is there a solution? Barber HR Bull N Y Acad Med; 1991; 67(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 2049569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Issues in medical malpractice XV. Tan SY Hawaii Med J; 2007 Sep; 66(9):250. PubMed ID: 20879471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Meningitis and legal liability: an otolaryngology perspective. Svider PF; Blake DM; Sahni KP; Folbe AJ; Liu JK; Baredes S; Eloy JA Am J Otolaryngol; 2014; 35(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24074731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Medical malpractice: an empirical examination of the litigation process. Farber HS; White MJ Rand J Econ; 1991; 22(2):199-217. PubMed ID: 10112180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [The so-called specialist status from the viewpoint of jurisdiction of the German court of justice]. Steffen E Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):595-7. PubMed ID: 8588429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Responsibilities of physicians in legal practice with emphasis on civil law]. Veselić I Lijec Vjesn; 2007; 129 Suppl 5():13-9. PubMed ID: 18283869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Understanding the competence review process. Keenan R Nurs N Z; 2006 Oct; 12(9):26-7. PubMed ID: 17112077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Litigation in anaesthesia. Coleman NA Br J Hosp Med; 1996 Jan 17-Feb 6; 55(1-2):62-4. PubMed ID: 8646398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: what physicians need to know about the Act. Hay CR Kans Med; 1989 Sep; 90(9):239-40, 242, 244. PubMed ID: 2810989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. An introduction to clinical negligence: nurses and the law. Tingle J Br J Nurs; 2002 Aug 8-Sep 11; 11(15):1033-5. PubMed ID: 12181511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Nurse who would not acknowledge her lack of competence. Castledine G Br J Nurs; 2004 May 27-Jun 9; 13(10):607. PubMed ID: 15215717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The role of clinical guidelines in medical negligence litigation: has India made the shift? Bhatt M Indian J Med Ethics; 2009; 6(3):158-9. PubMed ID: 19653595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Do we need a critical care ultrasound certification program? Implications from an Australian medical-legal perspective. Huang SJ; McLean AS Crit Care; 2010; 14(3):313. PubMed ID: 20550724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Care responsibilities of the surgeon in the jurisdiction of the federal court]. Steffen E Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1984; 364():287-91. PubMed ID: 6503533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]