These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12476494)
1. Functional appliance treatment assessed using the PAR index. Wijayaratne D; Harkness M; Herbison P Aust Orthod J; 2000 Nov; 16(3):118-26. PubMed ID: 12476494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion. Rodrigues de Almeida M; Castanha Henriques JF; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Ursi W Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of early treatment on stability of occlusion in patients with Class II malocclusion. Pavlow SS; McGorray SP; Taylor MG; Dolce C; King GJ; Wheeler TT Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 18249290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome. Hönn M; Schneider C; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 16838095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of results in Class II: division 1 malocclusions by treated Frankel appliance]. Yiğit MD; Akin SZ Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 2489152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of early preorthodontic trainer treatment on Class II, division 1 patients. Usumez S; Uysal T; Sari Z; Basciftci FA; Karaman AI; Guray E Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 15529493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Apical root resorption comparison between Fränkel and eruption guidance appliances. Janson G; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):729-35. PubMed ID: 17561050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study. Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of Twin Block, Andresen and removable appliances in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Trenouth MJ Funct Orthod; 1992; 9(4):26-31. PubMed ID: 1452055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions. King GJ; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT; Dolce C; Taylor M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 12750665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized controlled study of early headgear treatment on occlusal stability--a 13 year follow-up. Krusinskiene V; Kiuttu P; Julku J; Silvola AS; Kantomaa T; Pirttiniemi P Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 18632838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. Nelson C; Harkness M; Herbison P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 8338068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index]. Piskorski D Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():335-51. PubMed ID: 15552857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index. Ngan P; Yiu C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 11029737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes. Marşan G Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary and cranial base changes during treatment with functional appliances. Courtney M; Harkness M; Herbison P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jun; 109(6):616-24. PubMed ID: 8659471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance. Aslan BI; Dinçer M Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatment. O'Neill K; Harkness M; Knight R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):371-6; discussion 377. PubMed ID: 11029730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]