These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12477569)

  • 1. Mechanotransduction in bone: genetic effects on mechanosensitivity in mice.
    Robling AG; Turner CH
    Bone; 2002 Nov; 31(5):562-9. PubMed ID: 12477569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for a skeletal mechanosensitivity gene on mouse chromosome 4.
    Robling AG; Li J; Shultz KL; Beamer WG; Turner CH
    FASEB J; 2003 Feb; 17(2):324-6. PubMed ID: 12490544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic effects on bone mechanotransduction in congenic mice harboring bone size and strength quantitative trait loci.
    Robling AG; Warden SJ; Shultz KL; Beamer WG; Turner CH
    J Bone Miner Res; 2007 Jul; 22(7):984-91. PubMed ID: 17371164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The skeletal responsiveness to mechanical loading is enhanced in mice with a null mutation in estrogen receptor-beta.
    Saxon LK; Robling AG; Castillo AB; Mohan S; Turner CH
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2007 Aug; 293(2):E484-91. PubMed ID: 17535856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Site specific bone adaptation response to mechanical loading.
    Kuruvilla SJ; Fox SD; Cullen DM; Akhter MP
    J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2008; 8(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 18398268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Osteocyte-derived insulin-like growth factor I is essential for determining bone mechanosensitivity.
    Lau KH; Baylink DJ; Zhou XD; Rodriguez D; Bonewald LF; Li Z; Ruffoni D; Müller R; Kesavan C; Sheng MH
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2013 Jul; 305(2):E271-81. PubMed ID: 23715728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Leptin receptor (Lepr) is a negative modulator of bone mechanosensitivity and genetic variations in Lepr may contribute to the differential osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation in the C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ pair of mouse strains.
    Kapur S; Amoui M; Kesavan C; Wang X; Mohan S; Baylink DJ; Lau KH
    J Biol Chem; 2010 Nov; 285(48):37607-18. PubMed ID: 20851886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a technique for studying functional adaptation of the mouse ulna in response to mechanical loading.
    Lee KC; Maxwell A; Lanyon LE
    Bone; 2002 Sep; 31(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 12231414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical loading-induced gene expression and BMD changes are different in two inbred mouse strains.
    Kesavan C; Mohan S; Oberholtzer S; Wergedal JE; Baylink DJ
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2005 Nov; 99(5):1951-7. PubMed ID: 16024522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shorter, more frequent mechanical loading sessions enhance bone mass.
    Robling AG; Hinant FM; Burr DB; Turner CH
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Feb; 34(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 11828225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone intrinsic material properties in three inbred mouse strains.
    Akhter MP; Fan Z; Rho JY
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Nov; 75(5):416-20. PubMed ID: 15592798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanosensitivity of the rat skeleton decreases after a long period of loading, but is improved with time off.
    Saxon LK; Robling AG; Alam I; Turner CH
    Bone; 2005 Mar; 36(3):454-64. PubMed ID: 15777679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical stimulation and intermittent parathyroid hormone treatment induce disproportional osteogenic, geometric, and biomechanical effects in growing mouse bone.
    McAteer ME; Niziolek PJ; Ellis SN; Alge DL; Robling AG
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2010 May; 86(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 20306026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The establishment of a mechanobiology model of bone and functional adaptation in response to mechanical loading.
    Chen XY; Zhang XZ; Guo Y; Li RX; Lin JJ; Wei Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008; 23 Suppl 1():S88-95. PubMed ID: 18448217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic variations in bone density, histomorphometry, and strength in mice.
    Akhter MP; Iwaniec UT; Covey MA; Cullen DM; Kimmel DB; Recker RR
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2000 Oct; 67(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 11000349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential effects of bone structural and material properties on bone competence in C57BL/6 and C3H/He inbred strains of mice.
    Voide R; van Lenthe GH; Müller R
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2008 Jul; 83(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 18545865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone's responses to mechanical loading are impaired in type 1 diabetes.
    Parajuli A; Liu C; Li W; Gu X; Lai X; Pei S; Price C; You L; Lu XL; Wang L
    Bone; 2015 Dec; 81():152-160. PubMed ID: 26183251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone response to in vivo mechanical loading in two breeds of mice.
    Akhter MP; Cullen DM; Pedersen EA; Kimmel DB; Recker RR
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1998 Nov; 63(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 9799831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-amplitude, broad-frequency vibration effects on cortical bone formation in mice.
    Castillo AB; Alam I; Tanaka SM; Levenda J; Li J; Warden SJ; Turner CH
    Bone; 2006 Nov; 39(5):1087-1096. PubMed ID: 16793358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numerical modeling of long bone adaptation due to mechanical loading: correlation with experiments.
    Chennimalai Kumar N; Dantzig JA; Jasiuk IM; Robling AG; Turner CH
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 38(3):594-604. PubMed ID: 20013156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.