170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12478106)
1. Prospective analysis of computerized tomography and needle biopsy with permanent sectioning to determine the nature of solid renal masses in adults.
Dechet CB; Zincke H; Sebo TJ; King BF; LeRoy AJ; Farrow GM; Blute ML
J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 12478106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective analysis of intraoperative frozen needle biopsy of solid renal masses in adults.
Dechet CB; Sebo T; Farrow G; Blute ML; Engen DE; Zincke H
J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1282-4; discussion 1284-5. PubMed ID: 10492180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy of solid renal masses: analysis of safety, efficacy, pathologic interpretation, and clinical significance.
Alle N; Tan N; Huss J; Huang J; Pantuck A; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jul; 43(7):1813-1819. PubMed ID: 29079986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D cone-beam CT guidance, a novel technique in renal biopsy--results in 41 patients with suspected renal masses.
Braak SJ; van Melick HH; Onaca MG; van Heesewijk JP; van Strijen MJ
Eur Radiol; 2012 Nov; 22(11):2547-52. PubMed ID: 22660984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Renal mass core biopsy: accuracy and impact on clinical management.
Maturen KE; Nghiem HV; Caoili EM; Higgins EG; Wolf JS; Wood DP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):563-70. PubMed ID: 17242269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Results of computerized tomography guided percutaneous ablation of renal masses with nondiagnostic pre-ablation pathological findings.
Permpongkosol S; Link RE; Solomon SB; Kavoussi LR
J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):463-7; discussion 467. PubMed ID: 16813865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses.
Neuzillet Y; Lechevallier E; Andre M; Daniel L; Coulange C
J Urol; 2004 May; 171(5):1802-5. PubMed ID: 15076280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of small renal masses in real practice: sensitivity and specificity according to subjective radiologic interpretation.
Kim JH; Sun HY; Hwang J; Hong SS; Cho YJ; Doo SW; Yang WJ; Song YS
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 14(1):260. PubMed ID: 27729042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sonographically guided renal mass biopsy: indications and efficacy.
Johnson PT; Nazarian LN; Feld RI; Needleman L; Lev-Toaff AS; Segal SR; Halpern EJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Jul; 20(7):749-53; quiz 755. PubMed ID: 11444733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percutaneous core biopsy for renal masses: indications, accuracy and results.
Lebret T; Poulain JE; Molinie V; Herve JM; Denoux Y; Guth A; Scherrer A; Botto H
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1184-8; discussion 1188. PubMed ID: 17698122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Percutaneous biopsy of the renal mass: FNA or core needle biopsy?
Yang CS; Choi E; Idrees MT; Chen S; Wu HH
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Jun; 125(6):407-415. PubMed ID: 28334518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image-guided biopsy-diagnosed renal cell carcinoma: critical appraisal of technique and long-term follow-up.
Somani BK; Nabi G; Thorpe P; N'Dow J; Swami S; McClinton S;
Eur Urol; 2007 May; 51(5):1289-95; discussion 1296-7. PubMed ID: 17081679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses.
Caoili EM; Bude RO; Higgins EJ; Hoff DL; Nghiem HV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 12130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Percutaneous US-guided needle biopsies of solid renal masses.
Aribaş BK; Arda K; Aktaş E; Ciledağ N; Yakut F; Sahin G; Coşar Y; Doğan K; Kaya G
Neoplasma; 2011; 58(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 21275465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of preoperative needle core biopsy for diagnosing benign lesions among small, incidentally detected renal masses.
Shannon BA; Cohen RJ; de Bruto H; Davies RJ
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1257-61; discussion 1261. PubMed ID: 18707712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and implications of percutaneous renal biopsy in the management of renal masses.
Londoño DC; Wuerstle MC; Thomas AA; Salazar LE; Hsu JW; Danial T; Chien GW
Perm J; 2013; 17(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 24355883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Solid renal masses in adults: image-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and imaging techniques--"two heads better than one?".
García-Solano J; Acosta-Ortega J; Pérez-Guillermo M; Benedicto-Orovitg JM; Jiménez-Penick FJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Jan; 36(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18064683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk Factors for Complications and Nondiagnostic Results following 1,155 Consecutive Percutaneous Core Renal Mass Biopsies.
Posielski NM; Bui A; Wells SA; Best SL; Gettle LM; Ziemlewicz TJ; Lubner MG; Hinshaw JL; Lee FT; Allen GO; Nakada SY; Abel EJ
J Urol; 2019 Jun; 201(6):1080-1087. PubMed ID: 30741848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Percutaneous biopsy in diffuse renal disease: comparison of 18- and 14-gauge automated biopsy devices.
Song JH; Cronan JJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1998; 9(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 9684839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses.
Schmidbauer J; Remzi M; Memarsadeghi M; Haitel A; Klingler HC; Katzenbeisser D; Wiener H; Marberger M
Eur Urol; 2008 May; 53(5):1003-11. PubMed ID: 18061339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
