These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12478256)

  • 1. Ousted creationist sues over website.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2002 Dec; 420(6916):597. PubMed ID: 12478256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The real dirty secret of academic publishing.
    Svetlov V
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):897. PubMed ID: 15496892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Copied citations give impact factors a boost.
    Clarke T
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6938):373. PubMed ID: 12761513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Critics blast 'premature' paper on adult stem cells.
    Schiermeier Q; Leeb M
    Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6992):590. PubMed ID: 15190319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Internet and the Journal.
    Finegold L
    N Engl J Med; 1995 Oct; 333(16):1079; author reply 1079-80. PubMed ID: 7675060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retractions' realities.
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer-reviewed paper defends theory of intelligent design.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7005):114. PubMed ID: 15356591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?
    Frishauf P
    MedGenMed; 2006 Jan; 8(1):5. PubMed ID: 16915135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paranoid about peer review?
    Rumjanek FD
    Nature; 1996 Dec; 384(6609):509. PubMed ID: 8955262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readers' and author's responses to "are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?".
    Goldstone RA
    MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):70; author reply 70. PubMed ID: 16967523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preprint server seeks way to halt plagiarists.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6962):7. PubMed ID: 14603280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Axeing of website article sparks row at Max Planck.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2003 Apr; 422(6931):460. PubMed ID: 12673216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Creationists launch 'science' journal.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2008 Jan; 451(7177):382-3. PubMed ID: 18216813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
    Shim EH; Parekh V
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact factors: a tool of the sterile audit culture.
    Tuck A
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6944):14. PubMed ID: 12840730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Journals: impact factors are too highly valued.
    Davies J
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):210. PubMed ID: 12529611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Internet and the Journal.
    Goldwein JW; Benjamin I
    N Engl J Med; 1995 Oct; 333(16):1078; author reply 1079-80. PubMed ID: 7675057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HIV denialists will exploit any journal's tolerance.
    Moore JP
    Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6977):777. PubMed ID: 14985731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Connections between open access publishing and access to gray literature.
    Banks M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Apr; 92(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 15088074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Crisis of the scientific communication].
    Ramel B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Sep; 165(37):3514-8. PubMed ID: 14531352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.