These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12478256)
41. Readers' and author's responses to "are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?". Giustini D MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):70. PubMed ID: 16967522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Readers' and author's responses to "are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?". Ward JA MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):70. PubMed ID: 16967524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Key elements of access policies for biorepositories associated with population science research. Lemrow SM; Colditz GA; Vaught JB; Hartge P Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1533-5. PubMed ID: 17684124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Editorial comment should accompany hot papers online. Detours V Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7215):861. PubMed ID: 18923488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Ensuring the quality of peer-review process. Afifi M Saudi Med J; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1253. PubMed ID: 16883466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Web quality control for lectures: Supercourse and Amazon.com. Linkov F; LaPorte R; Lovalekar M; Dodani S Croat Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(6):875-8. PubMed ID: 16342339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing. Jefferson T; Shashok K Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors. Verhagen JV; Wallace KJ; Collins SC; Scott TR Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6967):602. PubMed ID: 14668833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Peer review: evolution or revolution? Broome ME Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 16597521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process. Giles J Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Future of open access could be online and peer-reviewed. Sandal M Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7201):158. PubMed ID: 18615058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Want to be recognised? Update your website publication list! Moore A Bioessays; 2013 Apr; 35(4):301. PubMed ID: 23494531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Peer review of guidelines, best practice statements and new documents: what this means for how we use them. Droller MJ J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2297-8. PubMed ID: 18930290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. A challenge for scientific medical journals: quest for the holy p-pub/e-pub balance. Wagner GS J Electrocardiol; 2006 Apr; 39(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 16580406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. God vs. science. Van Biema D Time; 2006 Nov; 168(20):48-55. PubMed ID: 17153054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Structure and format of peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts. Manske PR J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 31(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16945702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Why are people reluctant to join in open review? Liu SV Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]