These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12478417)

  • 1. Limitations of a cosolvent for ecotoxicity testing of hydrophobic compounds.
    Bundy JG; Maciel H; Cronin MT; Paton GI
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2003 Jan; 70(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12478417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of an additional ecotoxicity test on ecological quality standards.
    Henning-de Jong I; Ragas AM; Hendriks HW; Huijbregts MA; Posthuma L; Wintersen A; Jan Hendriks A
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Nov; 72(8):2037-45. PubMed ID: 19748120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of a bioluminescent bacterial assay in terrestrial ecotoxicity testing.
    Trott D; Dawson JJ; Killham KS; Miah MR; Wilson MJ; Paton GI
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Jan; 9(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 17213941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ecological risk assessment of contaminated soils through direct toxicity assessment.
    Fernández MD; Cagigal E; Vega MM; Urzelai A; Babín M; Pro J; Tarazona JV
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 16112018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ecotoxicity monitoring of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil during bioremediation: a case study.
    Hubálek T; Vosáhlová S; Matejů V; Kovácová N; Novotný C
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17106791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An exploration of the relationship between adsorption and bioavailability of pesticides in soil to earthworm.
    Yu YL; Wu XM; Li SN; Fang H; Zhan HY; Yu JQ
    Environ Pollut; 2006 Jun; 141(3):428-33. PubMed ID: 16274907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of bioassays by testing whole soil and their water extract from contaminated sites.
    Leitgib L; Kálmán J; Gruiz K
    Chemosphere; 2007 Jan; 66(3):428-34. PubMed ID: 16860849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acute and sublethal toxicity tests to monitor the impact of leachate on an aquatic environment.
    Bloor MC; Banks CJ; Krivtsov V
    Environ Int; 2005 Feb; 31(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 15661294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the environmental impact of micro-pollutants in the low Ebro River (Spain): an approach based on screening toxicity with Vibrio fischeri.
    Ocampo-Duque W; Sierra J; Ferré-Huguet N; Schuhmacher M; Domingo JL
    Chemosphere; 2008 Jun; 72(5):715-21. PubMed ID: 18479729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of advanced oxidation processes on the toxicity of municipal landfill leachates.
    Slomczynska B; Wasowski J; Slomczynski T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 15077983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toxicity identification evaluation of leachates from municipal solid waste landfills: a multispecies approach.
    Isidori M; Lavorgna M; Nardelli A; Parrella A
    Chemosphere; 2003 Jul; 52(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 12729690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of genotoxic activity of petroleum hydrocarbon-bioremediated soil.
    Płaza G; Nałecz-Jawecki G; Ulfig K; Brigmon RL
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Nov; 62(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 16216636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fridericia peregrinabunda (Enchytraeidae) as a new test species for soil toxicity assessment.
    An YJ; Yang CY
    Chemosphere; 2009 Oct; 77(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 19683785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of automated high-throughput ecotoxicity and genotoxicity test systems and fields of application.
    Eisentraeger A; Brinkmann C; Michel K; Hahn S; Huettner M; Weber G
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):109-14. PubMed ID: 15497836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A rapid microbiotest for determination of soil toxicity to higher plants.
    Persoone G
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):97. PubMed ID: 18399429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra-laboratory evaluation of Microbial Assay for Risk Assessment (MARA) for potential application in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD).
    Wadhia K; Dando T; Thompson KC
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):953-8. PubMed ID: 17726555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bioassays for evaluating the water-extractable genotoxic and toxic potential of soils polluted by metal smelters.
    Vidic T; Lah B; Berden-Zrimec M; Marinsek-Logar R
    Environ Toxicol; 2009 Oct; 24(5):472-83. PubMed ID: 18973278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Toxicity of selected hydrocarbons against chlorella in laboratory cultures].
    Wardas W; Wardas M; Mazurek U; Waszkiewicz E; Majnusz U
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1987; 38(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 3451356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing soil ecotoxicity of methyl tert-butyl ether using earthworm bioassay; closed soil microcosm test for volatile organic compounds.
    An YJ
    Environ Pollut; 2005 Mar; 134(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15589644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental impact of highway construction and repair materials on surface and ground waters. Case study: crumb rubber asphalt concrete.
    Azizian MF; Nelson PO; Thayumanavan P; Williamson KJ
    Waste Manag; 2003; 23(8):719-28. PubMed ID: 14522190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.